-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Every family should have a known upstream repo #7121
Comments
@chrissimpkins and I are setting up the Q2 milestone with a full slate of issues, and I just discussed #7358 with @simoncozens and we agreed it would be fantastic if @eliheuer could take on the laborious legwork to make the tool Simon posted the output of above reach 100% :) @simoncozens please unassign once the tool is part of gf-tools and ready for Eli to work with :) |
The script to list known upstream status is found at https://github.com/simoncozens/gf-dashboard/blob/main/list-known-upstreams.py |
Latest stats:
|
@emmamarichal @vv-monsalve @m4rc1e I came across this tracker today following our discussion about upstream repository URLs |
@cmyr and @rsheeter shared that
This is useful as we make progress on this, mostly next year |
How should designers update this info if they can? |
We need a source stanza in the metadata file, for example https://github.com/google/fonts/blob/main/ofl/abeezee/METADATA.pb In a perfect world that repository would have a gftools builder config, for example https://github.com/googlefonts/abeezee/blob/main/sources/config.yaml. |
For context, ^ empowers our old/new compiler comparison. https://googlefonts.github.io/fontc_crater/ has results. |
At the risk of getting into spoiler territory, if it also sounds empowering to test things on SFD sources and with non-Git DVCSes, then I have some EXCITING NEWS.... |
This is somehow my Halloween costume next year lol. |
(I am using this issue as way to track and dump information.)
In order to (a) improve and update existing fonts to evolving QA standards, (b) test the fontc compiler, and (c) eventually remove binary artefacts from this repository (a very long term goal), we want to be able to rebuild every Google Fonts font from sources. And that means we need to know where the sources are! This is information we really should have anyway, but for some historical fonts, we don't.
Currently:
The fonts missing upstreams are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: