You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Classes without a list of bases are old style classes, and Grumpy doesn't current support them. I've debated whether to bother supporting old style classes since Python 3 gets rid of them.
Unfortunately there are subtle behavioral differences between new and old style classes so we can't just pretend to support them by replacing the empty list of bases with (object).
For modules that use old style classes, I've just been modifying the code to add the object base class and hoping that they continue to work correctly.
any transcompiled simple (empty) python class, raising same error:
to reproduce the issue, create a python file with below code, then transcompile, and run:
it is happening because of a sanity check here, anyway it needs more investigation to see why base class is empty there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: