MOE Sync 2020-08-21 #3994
Merged
MOE Sync 2020-08-21 #3994
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rns in Java 9+. Doing so produces a jar that doesn't work under Java 8. This CL addresses the currently existing problematic calls (by calling the methods on the supertype Buffer instead), but we should also add safeguards. The normal solution to this general problem is to use --release, but doing so here is complicated. For more information, see #3990 RELNOTES=n/a ------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=327654073
netdpb
added
the
internal-sync
This was referenced Aug 21, 2020
Check for problems with ByteBuffer covariant return types when building with JDK 9+
google/jimfs#113
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This code has been reviewed and submitted internally. Feel free to discuss on
the PR, and we can submit follow-up changes as necessary.
Commits:
Don't directly call ByteBuffer, etc. methods that have covariant returns in Java 9+.
Doing so produces a jar that doesn't work under Java 8.
This CL addresses the currently existing problematic calls (by calling the methods on the supertype Buffer instead), but we should also add safeguards.
The normal solution to this general problem is to use --release, but doing so here is complicated.
For more information, see #3990
406a4ea