This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 16, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add enough fields to Proof to support proof of absence #5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In the case that the desired VUF falls under a subtree that contains a single, different, node, the proof of absence has to be a presence proof for that node, showing that the different node exists but no other node exists under that subtree.
This was referenced Jun 17, 2015
gdbelvin
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2015
Add enough fields to Proof to support proof of absence
kant
added a commit
to kant/keytransparency
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2018
gdbelvin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2018
gdbelvin
referenced
this pull request
in gdbelvin/keytransparency
Jun 27, 2018
* master: Fix title format on #5 (google#1008)
gdbelvin
referenced
this pull request
in gdbelvin/keytransparency
Jul 6, 2018
* master: Add integration test to code coverage metrics (google#1010) Main Title format fixed (google#1007) Fix queue deadlock (google#1006) Fix title format on #5 (google#1008)
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the case that the desired VUF falls under a subtree that contains a
single, different, node, the proof of absence has to be a presence proof
for that node, showing that the different node exists but no other node
exists under that subtree.