Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Add excludeFromIndexes in the proper places for large properties of nested fields #1266

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

danieljbruce
Copy link
Contributor

Solves #1242.

This PR combines the following PRs which have already been reviewed:

#1265
#1264
#1263

* Add interfaces that restrict values passed to save

* Add interfaces for save

We need help from the compiler so these interfaces will be useful for determining the shape of the data.

* Modify current interfaces to make a closer match

The interfaces should match the actual data types that get passed in.

* key and data in PrepareEntityObjectResponse option

These properties are actually optional

* Document all the interfaces added for the save fn

* Add two tests showing name/value should be provide

* Make the SaveNonArrayData more specific.

save doesn’t encode strings or ints or any values that don’t have keys properly so we should restrict the interface to what it does include.

* Add header

* Test should be more flexible

* Add a class for elements with ToString

* Define the toString class inline

* Eliminate links to points in code
…es for a complex case (#1263)

* Write a sample test for what save output should be

* Add a test for a bunch of complex excludeFromIndex

* Change the replace function so it works everywhere

* Modify the expected value

Make it contain longStringArray

* Correct the test for evaluating arrays

* Break up the entityToEntityProto into separate par

* Fix the tests to work with new addExcludeFromIndex

* Revert "Break up the entityToEntityProto into separate par"

This reverts commit 60dabd7.

* Revert "Fix the tests to work with new addExcludeFromIndex"

This reverts commit ba4e82b.

* Remove source code changes

* Skip the test that looks at arrays

* Remove some of the wildcard indexes

This is in excludeFromIndexes - replace them with literals.

* Remove another boolean value from excludeFromIndex

* Eliminate duplicate expectedMutations

* Eliminate duplicate runTest function

* Begin to set up the async tests

* Pack all tests into the async framework

* Delete tests addressed by async

* Get rid of test functions and inline everything

* Add comment

* Add comments describing each test case

* Remove only

* Add another test looks at name/value not in array

* Add a test for excludeLarge properties and name/va

* Fix the test so that the array case matches

Matches the single case

* should pass the right properties for an array

* Rename the test

* Change name to entityName

* Add two tests that capture the array encoding

encoding problem

* Change expected output of arrays

* Remove only

* Add 2 more tests to ensure behaviour is preserved

* Correct test - it should apply excludeFromIndexes

* Update the test for the nested value
* Write a sample test for what save output should be

* Add a test for a bunch of complex excludeFromIndex

* Change the replace function so it works everywhere

* Modify the expected value

Make it contain longStringArray

* Correct the test for evaluating arrays

* Break up the entityToEntityProto into separate par

* Fix the tests to work with new addExcludeFromIndex

* Break up the entityToEntityProto into separate par

* Fix the tests to work with new addExcludeFromIndex

* Revert "Break up the entityToEntityProto into separate par"

This reverts commit 60dabd7.

* Revert "Fix the tests to work with new addExcludeFromIndex"

This reverts commit ba4e82b.

* Remove source code changes

* Skip the test that looks at arrays

* Remove some of the wildcard indexes

This is in excludeFromIndexes - replace them with literals.

* Remove another boolean value from excludeFromIndex

* Eliminate duplicate expectedMutations

* Eliminate duplicate runTest function

* Begin to set up the async tests

* Pack all tests into the async framework

* Delete tests addressed by async

* Get rid of test functions and inline everything

* Add comment

* Add comments describing each test case

* Remove only

* Add another test looks at name/value not in array

* Add a test for excludeLarge properties and name/va

* Fix the test so that the array case matches

Matches the single case

* should pass the right properties for an array

* Rename the test

* Change name to entityName

* Add two tests that capture the array encoding

encoding problem

* Change expected output of arrays

* Remove only

* Add 2 more tests to ensure behaviour is preserved

* Make argument more specific for excludeFromIndexes

* Use excludeLargeProperties for array/non-array cas

* Fix the test to include entity proto

* Correct mistakes in initial implementation

* Don’t skip any of the tests

* Remove only

* Add check for excludeLargeProperties

* Remove TODO
@danieljbruce danieljbruce requested review from a team as code owners August 28, 2024 15:00
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: l Pull request size is large. api: datastore Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-datastore API. labels Aug 28, 2024
@danieljbruce danieljbruce merged commit 9c7730a into main Aug 28, 2024
18 checks passed
@danieljbruce danieljbruce deleted the 1242-to-main-2 branch August 28, 2024 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: datastore Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-datastore API. size: l Pull request size is large.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants