Deprecate pseudo operator :if(...), :if-not(...), reuse :has(...), :not(...)
#3683
Comments
gorhill
changed the title
:if(...), :if-not(...), reuse :has(...) and add :has-not(...):if(...), :if-not(...), reuse :has(...), :not(...)
gorhill
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 25, 2018
8 tasks
gorhill
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2018
gorhill
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 15, 2018
Related issue: <#3683> Additionally, improve compile-time error reporting in the logger
gorhill
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2018
|
If the last commit proves to work as expected, that should solve the issue here. |
|
Last commit was about uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#341 (comment)
|
|
Can you pleas check wiki and describe how this should work from your point of view? https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Procedural-cosmetic-filters#subjectnotarg |
|
I reviewed the doc. Note that I referred to the issue here in the commit because the original commit in the other issue was not really fixing the issue raised, it was however addressing partially the issue here. |
gorhill
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 26, 2018
Related issue: - #3683 This commit further increases uBO's procedural cosmetic filters Adguard's cosmetic filter syntax -- specifically those procedural cosmetic filters where plain CSS selectors appeared following a procedural oeprator (this was rejected as invalid by uBO). Also, experimental support for `:watch-attrs` procedural operator, as discussed in <uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#341 (comment)>. Support may be dropped before next release depending on whether a better solution is suggested. Additionally, the usual opportunistic refactoring toward ES6 syntax.
nimasaj
added a commit
to nimasaj/uBOPa
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2019
Updating syntaxes based on latest uBO changes. script:inject(...) >> +js(...), : https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Static-filter-syntax :if(...), :if-not(...) >> :has(...), :not(...), : gorhill/uBlock#3683
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A while ago I modified the behavior of
:has(...)to behave like:if(...)in order to more easily translate Adguard's own pseudo-operators. To simplify things I should just deprecate:if(...)/:if-not(...), to be replaced with:has(...)/:not(...)(Adguard uses:not(...)).The parser will translate deprecated
:if(...)/:if-not(...), but eventually in some future support should be removed completely.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: