Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pylontech US2000C - different SOC after a few days #6

Open
grasmax opened this issue Mar 27, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Pylontech US2000C - different SOC after a few days #6

grasmax opened this issue Mar 27, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@grasmax
Copy link
Owner

grasmax commented Mar 27, 2023

After just a few hours of discharging (no charging via solar or city power), the modules have different residual capacities.

"Overvoltage errors" occurred in the module with the lowest remaining capacity.

@grasmax grasmax changed the title Pylontech US2000C entladen sich sehr unterschiedlich Pylontech US2000C - different SOC after a few days Jul 3, 2023
@mi-hol
Copy link

mi-hol commented Aug 29, 2023

Did firmware updates resolve this issue?

@grasmax
Copy link
Owner Author

grasmax commented Aug 30, 2023

No.
And I am not satisfied with the pylontech support.

@grasmax
Copy link
Owner Author

grasmax commented Sep 1, 2023

Power off Juli, 13th 2023 20:00:
613 47,491 ,325-.326 21,5°C
615 46,527 ,324-.326 21,5°C
606 45,466 ,325-.326 21,3°C
843 45,303 ,325-.326 20,5°C

Check at September, 1st 2023 10:00
module number Ah CellVoltage Temperatue Voltage
613 47,468 ,333-.333 18,2-18,5°C 49,995V
615 46,525 ,332-.333 18 -18,2°C 49,982
606 45,464 ,332-.334 18 – 18,2°C 50,009
843 45,301 ,333-.334 18 – 18,1°C 50,008

It is unclear, whether the capacity really has not changed.
Or whether only storage statuses are read digitally and these are only changed when electricity flows in or out.

@mi-hol
Copy link

mi-hol commented Sep 1, 2023

It is unclear, whether the capacity really has not changed.

capacity means column Ah, right?
but I see a slight reduction i.e. module 613 went from 47,491 Ah down to 47,468 Ah

Do I read it wrong?

@grasmax
Copy link
Owner Author

grasmax commented Sep 1, 2023

Genau DAS meine ich mit gesunder Unschärfe: 0,03Ah in 7 Wochen.
Im Betrieb traten hingegen krasse Differenzen auf, die, wenn man sie nicht bemerkt und ausgleicht, wahrscheinlich zur Tiefenentladung und Zerstörung führen. Beispiel 16.6.2023:
20,6Ah 3,276-.278 19,4°C
24,4 ,276-,277 -->ca 50%
24,7 ,275-,277
15,2 ,275-,277 18,5°C --> ca 30%

@mi-hol
Copy link

mi-hol commented Sep 1, 2023

m Betrieb traten hingegen krasse Differenzen auf, die, wenn man sie nicht bemerkt und ausgleicht, wahrscheinlich zur Tiefenentladung und Zerstörung führen

Es gilt der alte Spruch "Versuch macht klug", die Versprechen des Herstellers stehen dem entgegen
image

@grasmax
Copy link
Owner Author

grasmax commented Sep 14, 2023

Stand am Anfang des Test am 6.9.
613 47,468 ,333-.333 18,2-18,5°C 49,995V
615 46,525 ,332-.333 18 -18,2°C 49,982
606 45,464 ,332-.334 18 – 18,2°C 50,009
843 45,301 ,333-.334 18 – 18,1°C 50,008

Stand am 14.9. 0730: seltsam: alle 4 Module zeigen 2/6 LED = 30% an!
613 7,53Ah ,256 - ,258 48,86V
615 12,14 (25%) ,254 - ,259 48,84
606 9,37 ,255 - ,260 48,86V
843 5,46 (10%!) ,256 - ,259 48,86V

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants