Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.

Annual prepayment plans (or once-a-week donations are *really* beancounter-unfriendly) #2401

Closed
ribasushi opened this issue May 15, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@ribasushi
Copy link

As part of the push to get more companies participating in my community an interesting problem popped up. While a CTO or someone equally up-high is really interested in giving back to the people they depend on, the extra weekly lineitem on the company books makes accountants cling to guns and stuff. This makes it a harder sell for a business as a whole, which is problematic.

On the other hand the once-a-week payout is just the right balance for receiver sustainability, so upsetting that would be a step backwards.

Thus the only practical thing to keep everything smooth seems to be an introduction of an account-prepayment service. Gittip already has the infrastructure for this internally, all that would be needed is to expose things for donors-to-be.

A lot of details are up in the air of course:

  • Could this encourage fire-and-forget donations undermining the sustainability principle?
  • Is going less than annual wise? Perhaps 6/months?
  • Is there a legal ramification of becoming an explicit escrow (as opposed to the implicit escrow gittip is today)
  • other stuff I can't think of

Thoughts?

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@frioux
Copy link

frioux commented May 15, 2014

My coworker who is looking into this was saying at the very least monthly would be easier. Quarterly could be nice too. But as you say, yearly is best for a business, where 51*foo doesn't "feel" any less.

@rcross
Copy link

rcross commented May 19, 2014

+1 - I had to address this issue myself by asking for a manual pre-loading on my account. There was some discussion about making it a bit more self-serve, but I don' think there was a lot of progress.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

★★☆

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

This is definitely something I've heard from people inside corps trying to give. It would help us a lot w/ corporate givers. I almost prioritized this as ★★★ and could probably be convinced to do so (would want to review existing ★★★s).

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre added this to the Solve Corporate Sponsorship of Open-Source milestone Apr 9, 2016
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

Folding this into #113.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants