This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

payin with dwolla #65

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this Issue Jun 17, 2012 · 48 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
@chadwhitacre
Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jun 17, 2012

"Ultimately we're trying to build the next Visa, not the next PayPal."

Dwolla is similar to Stripe Platform (see #58) in that everyone would have to create an account on Dwolla and then money would go directly from person to person instead of through a central Gittip bank account. I like this a lot. I had to upload a photo of my drivers license in order to integrate with a bank account, and there appears to be a manual review process before my bank is linked, and it's unclear that my bank is even linkable (it says "We could not add your bank at this time. Please complete any additional verification requirements.").

Geez. I think this would even be free.

"Cost to receive money in amounts greater than $10: $0.25"

Is the Dwolla (photo ID!) hurdle higher than giving up credit card details?

I think we need to support multiple options, like Venmo does (see #38). If tipper and tippee have Dwolla then we use that, if not then do a credit card dance. Something like that.

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@timothyfcook

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timothyfcook

timothyfcook Jun 17, 2012

Contributor

Wow, Dwolla is great. I've done a LOT of research into new payment platforms recently. Everything we've been using is downright criminal, especially for small payment/mini-tips/micro-donations. It makes NO sense that using electronic payment methods is more expensive than paper ones. Setting up EFT transfers is very tricky and, while not as bad as CC, is still pricey. Handwritten checks, for whatever reason, are still free.

That said, something like GIttip could be an excellent way to encourage new payment systems to gain popularity. As you mentioned, it doesn't do much good if only a few people have Dwolla. This is really big though... I've been searching for something like Dwolla for a few months, guess I didn't look hard enough. I love this quote: "This is very exciting - real time banking transfers. Time for ACH (and 5 working days money transfers) to die"

Maybe you could partner intentionally with Dwolla somehow to get more traffic headed your way. A site like yours could be a great way for them to gain a lot of users. I would feel good about highlighting the Dwolla sign-up feature way more than the CC option... give them some serious advertising, for the sake of all of us.

Contributor

timothyfcook commented Jun 17, 2012

Wow, Dwolla is great. I've done a LOT of research into new payment platforms recently. Everything we've been using is downright criminal, especially for small payment/mini-tips/micro-donations. It makes NO sense that using electronic payment methods is more expensive than paper ones. Setting up EFT transfers is very tricky and, while not as bad as CC, is still pricey. Handwritten checks, for whatever reason, are still free.

That said, something like GIttip could be an excellent way to encourage new payment systems to gain popularity. As you mentioned, it doesn't do much good if only a few people have Dwolla. This is really big though... I've been searching for something like Dwolla for a few months, guess I didn't look hard enough. I love this quote: "This is very exciting - real time banking transfers. Time for ACH (and 5 working days money transfers) to die"

Maybe you could partner intentionally with Dwolla somehow to get more traffic headed your way. A site like yours could be a great way for them to gain a lot of users. I would feel good about highlighting the Dwolla sign-up feature way more than the CC option... give them some serious advertising, for the sake of all of us.

@timothyfcook

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timothyfcook

timothyfcook Jun 17, 2012

Contributor

The rhetoric Dwolla uses is just like Gittip:

We think, in the long term, sending money should be as easy and effortless as finding a friend on Facebook. That's really a behavior we try to mimic when it comes to peer-to -eer payments. When someone does not have a Dwolla account, they get a wall post that says, "You've got money."

You can send people money without them signing up, but they can only receive it if they sign up and claim it... another synergy. Been reading about dwolla for the past half hour. I'm hooked.

Contributor

timothyfcook commented Jun 17, 2012

The rhetoric Dwolla uses is just like Gittip:

We think, in the long term, sending money should be as easy and effortless as finding a friend on Facebook. That's really a behavior we try to mimic when it comes to peer-to -eer payments. When someone does not have a Dwolla account, they get a wall post that says, "You've got money."

You can send people money without them signing up, but they can only receive it if they sign up and claim it... another synergy. Been reading about dwolla for the past half hour. I'm hooked.

@timothyfcook

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timothyfcook

timothyfcook Jun 17, 2012

Contributor

Just realized, essentially what Dwolla does is eliminate a 3% tax that we---somewhat ignorantly--pay on everything we purchase.

Contributor

timothyfcook commented Jun 17, 2012

Just realized, essentially what Dwolla does is eliminate a 3% tax that we---somewhat ignorantly--pay on everything we purchase.

@ipmb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jun 25, 2012

Contributor

Word. Best way forward is multiple ways to move money in and out, methinks.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jun 25, 2012

Word. Best way forward is multiple ways to move money in and out, methinks.

@timothyfcook

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timothyfcook

timothyfcook Jun 25, 2012

Contributor

Hopefully this new Balanced Payments works out. Are you hoping their "escrowing" capability will enable the holding of $$ until disbursement time (friday)?

The UI should be:

"You tip $1.32 per week." To back your tips:
1. Link your fancy new Dwolla account (and save on processing fees)
2. Or link your old timey credit card (and add the processing fees to your payment)

On Jun 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Chad Whitacre wrote:

Word. Best way forward is multiple ways to move money in and out, methinks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/65#issuecomment-6556027

Contributor

timothyfcook commented Jun 25, 2012

Hopefully this new Balanced Payments works out. Are you hoping their "escrowing" capability will enable the holding of $$ until disbursement time (friday)?

The UI should be:

"You tip $1.32 per week." To back your tips:
1. Link your fancy new Dwolla account (and save on processing fees)
2. Or link your old timey credit card (and add the processing fees to your payment)

On Jun 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Chad Whitacre wrote:

Word. Best way forward is multiple ways to move money in and out, methinks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/65#issuecomment-6556027

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 6, 2012

Contributor

@ipmb Who isn't US only?

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 6, 2012

@ipmb Who isn't US only?

@ipmb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ipmb

ipmb Jul 6, 2012

Credit cards. I have no experience with them, but Paxum is out there as well. Only know about them from the TradeHill/Dwolla fiasco.

ipmb commented Jul 6, 2012

Credit cards. I have no experience with them, but Paxum is out there as well. Only know about them from the TradeHill/Dwolla fiasco.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 8, 2012

Contributor

Right. Credit cards are working now for international payins (though this could be clearer; #57). Where we're currently stuck is international pay_outs_ (#126).

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 8, 2012

Right. Credit cards are working now for international payins (though this could be clearer; #57). Where we're currently stuck is international pay_outs_ (#126).

@treyhunner

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@treyhunner

treyhunner Jul 24, 2012

👍 from me.

Losing $0.30 plus 2.9% per deposits and $0.25 per withdrawal is a shame when the transaction amounts are so small.

👍 from me.

Losing $0.30 plus 2.9% per deposits and $0.25 per withdrawal is a shame when the transaction amounts are so small.

@jfricker

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jfricker

jfricker Jul 24, 2012

+1 for Dwolla. Seems like a natural fit.

+1 for Dwolla. Seems like a natural fit.

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghost

ghost Jul 30, 2012

Just saw this thread now. This is awesome. I'll get on it today and submit a pull request as soon as it's ready!

ghost commented Jul 30, 2012

Just saw this thread now. This is awesome. I'll get on it today and submit a pull request as soon as it's ready!

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 30, 2012

Contributor

@Dwolla: Thanks for jumping in! :-)

I want to make sure we respect Balanced, since they have already joined the Gittip dev community and have been contributing integration with their service (#78) as well as visual design (#66). My ideal would be to use Balanced for white-label credit card and ACH transfers (where the user enters cc/bank account details directly on the Gittip site) and have Dwolla as a second option.

My understanding is that users will have to be taken off the Gittip site to the Dwolla site to set up an account if they don't already have one, yes? Can you also help me understand how payment flow will work with Dwolla? We need to batch gifts to preserve anonymity. We don't want to do transfers directly from one user to another.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 30, 2012

@Dwolla: Thanks for jumping in! :-)

I want to make sure we respect Balanced, since they have already joined the Gittip dev community and have been contributing integration with their service (#78) as well as visual design (#66). My ideal would be to use Balanced for white-label credit card and ACH transfers (where the user enters cc/bank account details directly on the Gittip site) and have Dwolla as a second option.

My understanding is that users will have to be taken off the Gittip site to the Dwolla site to set up an account if they don't already have one, yes? Can you also help me understand how payment flow will work with Dwolla? We need to batch gifts to preserve anonymity. We don't want to do transfers directly from one user to another.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 30, 2012

Contributor

Let the record show that @timothyfcook got the ball rolling on this.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 30, 2012

Let the record show that @timothyfcook got the ball rolling on this.

@jkwade

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jkwade

jkwade Jul 30, 2012

Welcome aboard, @Dwolla! Please let us or @whit537 or @timothyfcook know how we can help you get going

jkwade commented Jul 30, 2012

Welcome aboard, @Dwolla! Please let us or @whit537 or @timothyfcook know how we can help you get going

@timothyfcook

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timothyfcook

timothyfcook Jul 30, 2012

Contributor

excited about @Dwolla integration, it's a perfect partnership.

Contributor

timothyfcook commented Jul 30, 2012

excited about @Dwolla integration, it's a perfect partnership.

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghost

ghost Jul 30, 2012

Thanks, @jkwade and @whit537. This is really exciting..

Anyway, yes, you're correct @whit537. If someone doesn't have a Dwolla account, they would have to create one on the Dwolla website. I think that the best way to go about this would be to use our OAuth / REST API. This would allow us to prompt a user for permissions the first time around, and never bother them again. Other than the Dwolla branded OAuth permissions pop up, we don't have to display Dwolla branding at all, and everything can happen on the gittip server.

Re batch processing: it's definitely possible. @whit537, I'm assuming you're ok with being the "merchant of record" for all these transactions?

ghost commented Jul 30, 2012

Thanks, @jkwade and @whit537. This is really exciting..

Anyway, yes, you're correct @whit537. If someone doesn't have a Dwolla account, they would have to create one on the Dwolla website. I think that the best way to go about this would be to use our OAuth / REST API. This would allow us to prompt a user for permissions the first time around, and never bother them again. Other than the Dwolla branded OAuth permissions pop up, we don't have to display Dwolla branding at all, and everything can happen on the gittip server.

Re batch processing: it's definitely possible. @whit537, I'm assuming you're ok with being the "merchant of record" for all these transactions?

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Aug 1, 2012

Contributor

@Dwolla Yes, I expect to be the merchant of record (I think). You are aware that Gittip is a marketplace aka third-party payment processor, right? Is that okay with you?

The data flow I need is, once a week, to pull money in from donors, aggregate it, and distribute it to donees. So if Alice, Bob, and Cletus are each set up to give Diane $3, then on Friday we pull in $3 each from Alice, Bob, and Cletus, and we deposit $9 in Diane's account. For transfers over $10 we need to upcharge on payin and subtract from payouts. So if Alice is giving $15 each week in total, then we actually charge her $15.25 to cover the $0.25 fee. On the way out, if Bob is receiving $15, then he actually only gets $14.75; he's responsible for the $0.25 fee to Dwolla. Make sense?

As far as the UI for associating a Dwolla account goes, I think it will work best to subsume that under a general "link accounts" feature. Presumably someone should be able to sign up for Gittip with only a Dwolla account (in the way that we use GitHub now).

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Aug 1, 2012

@Dwolla Yes, I expect to be the merchant of record (I think). You are aware that Gittip is a marketplace aka third-party payment processor, right? Is that okay with you?

The data flow I need is, once a week, to pull money in from donors, aggregate it, and distribute it to donees. So if Alice, Bob, and Cletus are each set up to give Diane $3, then on Friday we pull in $3 each from Alice, Bob, and Cletus, and we deposit $9 in Diane's account. For transfers over $10 we need to upcharge on payin and subtract from payouts. So if Alice is giving $15 each week in total, then we actually charge her $15.25 to cover the $0.25 fee. On the way out, if Bob is receiving $15, then he actually only gets $14.75; he's responsible for the $0.25 fee to Dwolla. Make sense?

As far as the UI for associating a Dwolla account goes, I think it will work best to subsume that under a general "link accounts" feature. Presumably someone should be able to sign up for Gittip with only a Dwolla account (in the way that we use GitHub now).

@timothyfcook

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timothyfcook

timothyfcook Aug 1, 2012

Contributor

Are you saying that you would have the transaction require a $0.25 Dwolla payment on both sides? Double-taxed? Seems less than ideal… but might be the only way to keep anonymity.

On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Chad Whitacre wrote:

@Dwolla Yes, I expect to be the merchant of record (I think). You are aware that Gittip is a marketplace aka third-party payment processor, right? Is that okay with you?

The data flow I need is, once a week, to pull money in from donors, aggregate it, and distribute it to donees. So if Alice, Bob, and Cletus are each set up to give Diane $3, then on Friday we pull in $3 each from Alice, Bob, and Cletus, and we deposit $9 in Diane's account. For transfers over $10 we need to upcharge on payin and subtract from payouts. So if Alice is giving $15 each week in total, then we actually charge her $15.25 to cover the $0.25 fee. On the way out, if Bob is receiving $15, then he actually only gets $14.75; he's responsible for the $0.25 fee to Dwolla. Make sense?

As far as the UI for associating a Dwolla account goes, I think it will work best to subsume that under a general "link accounts" feature. Presumably someone should be able to sign up for Gittip with only a Dwolla account (in the way that we use GitHub now).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/65#issuecomment-7438587

Contributor

timothyfcook commented Aug 1, 2012

Are you saying that you would have the transaction require a $0.25 Dwolla payment on both sides? Double-taxed? Seems less than ideal… but might be the only way to keep anonymity.

On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Chad Whitacre wrote:

@Dwolla Yes, I expect to be the merchant of record (I think). You are aware that Gittip is a marketplace aka third-party payment processor, right? Is that okay with you?

The data flow I need is, once a week, to pull money in from donors, aggregate it, and distribute it to donees. So if Alice, Bob, and Cletus are each set up to give Diane $3, then on Friday we pull in $3 each from Alice, Bob, and Cletus, and we deposit $9 in Diane's account. For transfers over $10 we need to upcharge on payin and subtract from payouts. So if Alice is giving $15 each week in total, then we actually charge her $15.25 to cover the $0.25 fee. On the way out, if Bob is receiving $15, then he actually only gets $14.75; he's responsible for the $0.25 fee to Dwolla. Make sense?

As far as the UI for associating a Dwolla account goes, I think it will work best to subsume that under a general "link accounts" feature. Presumably someone should be able to sign up for Gittip with only a Dwolla account (in the way that we use GitHub now).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/65#issuecomment-7438587

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Aug 1, 2012

Contributor

@timothyfcook If @Dwolla can suggest a way to preserve anonymity and minimize fees even further I'm open to that. Note that I am wary of paying Dwolla nothing because it disincentivizes them from participating.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Aug 1, 2012

@timothyfcook If @Dwolla can suggest a way to preserve anonymity and minimize fees even further I'm open to that. Note that I am wary of paying Dwolla nothing because it disincentivizes them from participating.

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghost

ghost Aug 1, 2012

I'd hate to double charge on this flow. If you guys are ok with splitting up payments into $10 blocks, I'd be more than happy to do that. We can do that on either sides of the payment, but I think the best way to go about this would be to split up the payouts from the Gittip account. What do you think?

Re UI, I agree with @whit537. I can add a "Connect with Dwolla" button that will trigger an OAuth permissions dialog.

ghost commented Aug 1, 2012

I'd hate to double charge on this flow. If you guys are ok with splitting up payments into $10 blocks, I'd be more than happy to do that. We can do that on either sides of the payment, but I think the best way to go about this would be to split up the payouts from the Gittip account. What do you think?

Re UI, I agree with @whit537. I can add a "Connect with Dwolla" button that will trigger an OAuth permissions dialog.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Aug 1, 2012

Contributor

Hmmm ... I'd actually be inclined to make the donee pay the $0.25, and chunk the payins. The donee is the customer here. They're the ones Gittip is designed for. And I expect payins to be more likely to be < $10 anyway.

Just scab on whatever you need for UI, @Dwolla. It's getting an overhaul in #66 and I'm happy to clean up whatever you give me in the mean time.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Aug 1, 2012

Hmmm ... I'd actually be inclined to make the donee pay the $0.25, and chunk the payins. The donee is the customer here. They're the ones Gittip is designed for. And I expect payins to be more likely to be < $10 anyway.

Just scab on whatever you need for UI, @Dwolla. It's getting an overhaul in #66 and I'm happy to clean up whatever you give me in the mean time.

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghost

ghost Aug 1, 2012

Awesome, yes. We can do chunk the payins. We're having a hackathon out here in NYC this weekend. I'll get this done then. Coincidentally, if any of you are in the area and would like to stop by for some free food and swag, let me know, I'll add you to the guest list.

ghost commented Aug 1, 2012

Awesome, yes. We can do chunk the payins. We're having a hackathon out here in NYC this weekend. I'll get this done then. Coincidentally, if any of you are in the area and would like to stop by for some free food and swag, let me know, I'll add you to the guest list.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Aug 16, 2012

Contributor

@Dwolla How was the hackathon? Any progress on this? Questions?

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Aug 16, 2012

@Dwolla How was the hackathon? Any progress on this? Questions?

@zellyn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@zellyn

zellyn Aug 27, 2012

@whit537 Have you thought about aggregating transfers the way iTunes does to avoid fees? For instance, with Dwolla, you have a fixed $0.25 fee. If donors could configure gittip to pull a larger chunk of money at a time, you could amortize the fee over several weeks. Also, if you organized things right, the held money could earn interest and provide an income for you. Or, if people (or you) aren't okay with that, you could let donors configure what should happen with the interest.

zellyn commented Aug 27, 2012

@whit537 Have you thought about aggregating transfers the way iTunes does to avoid fees? For instance, with Dwolla, you have a fixed $0.25 fee. If donors could configure gittip to pull a larger chunk of money at a time, you could amortize the fee over several weeks. Also, if you organized things right, the held money could earn interest and provide an income for you. Or, if people (or you) aren't okay with that, you could let donors configure what should happen with the interest.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Aug 31, 2012

Contributor

@zellyn We upped the minimum credit card charge to $10 to mitigate fees somewhat (#167). Prepayment could address this further; that's #113. I've ticketed the interest question as #279.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Aug 31, 2012

@zellyn We upped the minimum credit card charge to $10 to mitigate fees somewhat (#167). Prepayment could address this further; that's #113. I've ticketed the interest question as #279.

@domenkozar

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@domenkozar

domenkozar Sep 3, 2012

@Dwolla any word on non-US users?

@Dwolla any word on non-US users?

@chmike

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chmike

chmike Sep 21, 2012

What about MoneyBookers for international payment ? https://www.moneybookers.com/app/
It is quite simple to use. I did it some years ago. I don't want to use Pay Pal.

chmike commented Sep 21, 2012

What about MoneyBookers for international payment ? https://www.moneybookers.com/app/
It is quite simple to use. I did it some years ago. I don't want to use Pay Pal.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Mar 11, 2013

Contributor

@chmike MoneyBookers reticketed as #718.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Mar 11, 2013

@chmike MoneyBookers reticketed as #718.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Mar 11, 2013

Contributor

+1 from @jdsharp via Twitter.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Mar 11, 2013

+1 from @jdsharp via Twitter.

@untitaker

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@untitaker

untitaker May 2, 2013

@iElectric

at this time Dwolla is only available for use within the United States. We do not have plans to expand internationally at this time, but please stay tuned for future updates. If you are interested in following our progress and updates, please sign up to receive our newsletters by going to http://blog.dwolla.com/ and entering your email address into the appropriate field. Thank you for your interest in Dwolla.

http://help.dwolla.com/customer/portal/articles/282692-can-i-use-dwolla-outside-of-the-us-

@iElectric

at this time Dwolla is only available for use within the United States. We do not have plans to expand internationally at this time, but please stay tuned for future updates. If you are interested in following our progress and updates, please sign up to receive our newsletters by going to http://blog.dwolla.com/ and entering your email address into the appropriate field. Thank you for your interest in Dwolla.

http://help.dwolla.com/customer/portal/articles/282692-can-i-use-dwolla-outside-of-the-us-

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre May 6, 2013

Contributor

+1 from @DamosDaze on #812.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented May 6, 2013

+1 from @DamosDaze on #812.

@mvdkleijn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mvdkleijn

mvdkleijn Oct 3, 2013

Contributor

Seems @Dwolla has been very quiet on this ticket since the last time @whit537 asked @Dwolla how the hackathon went... a year ago.

Is this still going to happen? (personally I don't care since Dwolla is US-only)

Contributor

mvdkleijn commented Oct 3, 2013

Seems @Dwolla has been very quiet on this ticket since the last time @whit537 asked @Dwolla how the hackathon went... a year ago.

Is this still going to happen? (personally I don't care since Dwolla is US-only)

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 19, 2013

Contributor

+1 from Jonathan Kryza via support@gittip.com:

I found your website via a comment on Reddit. I think it is awesome but I could not help but notice your processing fees(which are pretty standard). Since a user has to setup an account and gittip only charges in $10 increments, I would highly recommend Dwolla. Anything $10 or below is FREE to process. Anything over is just $0.25....that's it. No percentages.

Dwolla also bypasses the banks, so any money transferred between accounts goes through immediately. If the recipient does not want to pay others with Dwolla, they can change a setting on the account to automatically move any available balance in their Dwolla account to their linked bank account.

They are in the US only right now, but I know this could save your donators/users money and you hassle.

Here is their dev page.

I do not work there, but I work in the card processing industry and love what they are doing.

Thanks and great work!

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 19, 2013

+1 from Jonathan Kryza via support@gittip.com:

I found your website via a comment on Reddit. I think it is awesome but I could not help but notice your processing fees(which are pretty standard). Since a user has to setup an account and gittip only charges in $10 increments, I would highly recommend Dwolla. Anything $10 or below is FREE to process. Anything over is just $0.25....that's it. No percentages.

Dwolla also bypasses the banks, so any money transferred between accounts goes through immediately. If the recipient does not want to pay others with Dwolla, they can change a setting on the account to automatically move any available balance in their Dwolla account to their linked bank account.

They are in the US only right now, but I know this could save your donators/users money and you hassle.

Here is their dev page.

I do not work there, but I work in the card processing industry and love what they are doing.

Thanks and great work!

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre referenced this issue Nov 19, 2013

Closed

payout via dwolla masspay #726

0 of 1 task complete
@mlncn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mlncn

mlncn Dec 15, 2013

Count me another who would very much like to pay via Dwolla rather than PayPal or even credit card directly. @Dwolla @whit537 what do we need to make this happen? What's the next step? Is there code somewhere to work on?

mlncn commented Dec 15, 2013

Count me another who would very much like to pay via Dwolla rather than PayPal or even credit card directly. @Dwolla @whit537 what do we need to make this happen? What's the next step? Is there code somewhere to work on?

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Dec 16, 2013

Contributor

@mlncn Weeellllll ... we don't really have any code for this already. The place to start would probably be with the user interface. Can you describe for us how this would fit into the site as it currently stands from a UI perspective?

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Dec 16, 2013

@mlncn Weeellllll ... we don't really have any code for this already. The place to start would probably be with the user interface. Can you describe for us how this would fit into the site as it currently stands from a UI perspective?

@mlncn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mlncn

mlncn Dec 20, 2013

The way GitTip is set up so far makes it quite simple for a first step. Change the prompt:

Back your gift with a credit card to make sure it goes through!

To:

Back your gift with a credit card or Dwolla to make sure it goes through!

And then, on a new dwolla.html page there's a button to authorize GitTip to connect with your Dwolla account and https://developers.dwolla.com/dev/pages/auth does the work (for that page, actually taking payments in, and ultimately out, with Dwolla will take a bit more code on our side).

mlncn commented Dec 20, 2013

The way GitTip is set up so far makes it quite simple for a first step. Change the prompt:

Back your gift with a credit card to make sure it goes through!

To:

Back your gift with a credit card or Dwolla to make sure it goes through!

And then, on a new dwolla.html page there's a button to authorize GitTip to connect with your Dwolla account and https://developers.dwolla.com/dev/pages/auth does the work (for that page, actually taking payments in, and ultimately out, with Dwolla will take a bit more code on our side).

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Dec 20, 2013

Contributor

Good start. Let's unpack that.

I guess we have an additional "Dwolla" entry under "Connected Accounts"?

What are the implications for payday? Right now payday runs as three loops: payin, pachinko, payout. The payin loop right now assumes that we have an instant API: charge a credit card, and know w/in ms that the money is ours to work with. Does Dwolla give us a similar instant API experience, or is it time-lagged?

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Dec 20, 2013

Good start. Let's unpack that.

I guess we have an additional "Dwolla" entry under "Connected Accounts"?

What are the implications for payday? Right now payday runs as three loops: payin, pachinko, payout. The payin loop right now assumes that we have an instant API: charge a credit card, and know w/in ms that the money is ours to work with. Does Dwolla give us a similar instant API experience, or is it time-lagged?

@mlncn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mlncn

mlncn Dec 22, 2013

If there is money in someone's Dwolla account, it is instant to put it in someone else's (GitTip's) Dwolla account. But if not, there's an about three day lag while money goes from the donor's bank account to Dwolla. I imagine most people, like me, don't keep any money in their Dwolla account, though. It is possible to set a minimum balance in Dwolla which would make all payments less than or equal to that minimum balance effectively instant.

(Back in 2011 they talked about something called Dwolla Instant where you could send money immediately even if it weren't in Dwolla yet, but it cost $3 a month which is a terrible deal, and i think they dropped that.)

What mechanisms are in place for a chargeback from a credit card company? As Dwolla hooks directly to people's bank accounts, i don't think the chances of the money not coming in in 3-4 days is too much higher than the chances of a chargeback.

These would be recurring payments though, and i don't know if Dwolla is smart enough to start getting the money from donors' bank accounts 4 days ahead of the recurring payment date, which would make the delay only an issue for the first one.

Maybe the easiest from GitTip's side would be if it only starts with the minimum balance put in Dwolla first, but i doubt Dwolla's API exposes that— and we still need recurring payments to either go through on time.

OK, right now i'm thinking easiest is a hard-coded 4-day delay on Dwolla-related payments to be sure we can check the money is there before anything starts.

@Dwolla some help here?

mlncn commented Dec 22, 2013

If there is money in someone's Dwolla account, it is instant to put it in someone else's (GitTip's) Dwolla account. But if not, there's an about three day lag while money goes from the donor's bank account to Dwolla. I imagine most people, like me, don't keep any money in their Dwolla account, though. It is possible to set a minimum balance in Dwolla which would make all payments less than or equal to that minimum balance effectively instant.

(Back in 2011 they talked about something called Dwolla Instant where you could send money immediately even if it weren't in Dwolla yet, but it cost $3 a month which is a terrible deal, and i think they dropped that.)

What mechanisms are in place for a chargeback from a credit card company? As Dwolla hooks directly to people's bank accounts, i don't think the chances of the money not coming in in 3-4 days is too much higher than the chances of a chargeback.

These would be recurring payments though, and i don't know if Dwolla is smart enough to start getting the money from donors' bank accounts 4 days ahead of the recurring payment date, which would make the delay only an issue for the first one.

Maybe the easiest from GitTip's side would be if it only starts with the minimum balance put in Dwolla first, but i doubt Dwolla's API exposes that— and we still need recurring payments to either go through on time.

OK, right now i'm thinking easiest is a hard-coded 4-day delay on Dwolla-related payments to be sure we can check the money is there before anything starts.

@Dwolla some help here?

@patcon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@patcon

patcon Apr 19, 2014

Contributor

+1 for dwolla pay-ins from some guy at this hostel

Contributor

patcon commented Apr 19, 2014

+1 for dwolla pay-ins from some guy at this hostel

@rummik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rummik

rummik Apr 21, 2014

Contributor

I'm going to +1 this as well. I like seeing more options where possible.

Contributor

rummik commented Apr 21, 2014

I'm going to +1 this as well. I like seeing more options where possible.

@duckinator

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@duckinator

duckinator Apr 21, 2014

Contributor

+1 for the same reason as @rummik.

Contributor

duckinator commented Apr 21, 2014

+1 for the same reason as @rummik.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre May 13, 2014

Contributor

+1 from @McCroden on Twitter.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented May 13, 2014

+1 from @McCroden on Twitter.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@avimar

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@avimar

avimar Aug 11, 2015

Dwolla cancelled their transaction fees, BTW.

avimar commented Aug 11, 2015

Dwolla cancelled their transaction fees, BTW.

@webmaven

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@webmaven

webmaven Nov 23, 2015

Contributor

I figure, since I am stumping for Dwolla payouts for myself (in #726), I might as well give my own 👍 for Dwolla pay_ins_, as well.

Contributor

webmaven commented Nov 23, 2015

I figure, since I am stumping for Dwolla payouts for myself (in #726), I might as well give my own 👍 for Dwolla pay_ins_, as well.

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre removed the ★☆☆ label Mar 4, 2016

@mattbk mattbk modified the milestone: Add Payin Methods Jun 29, 2016

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre removed this from the Add Payin Methods milestone Jan 4, 2017

@nobodxbodon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nobodxbodon

nobodxbodon Jan 12, 2017

Contributor

Re-ticketed to gratipay/inside.gratipay.com#974 for further discussion and planning. After deciding on concrete implementation plan and dev work starts, this will be reopened for tracking purpose.

Contributor

nobodxbodon commented Jan 12, 2017

Re-ticketed to gratipay/inside.gratipay.com#974 for further discussion and planning. After deciding on concrete implementation plan and dev work starts, this will be reopened for tracking purpose.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.