Set goals

[chadwhitacre]

I think our first reward tier should be a hand-written thank you note with stickers and a heart coin for the first donors up to $100,000.

Assuming for the moment that we reach that ... what next?

[chadwhitacre]

Could we find some interesting project that we could hire Libraries.io to do and publish the results?

Does OSI have any of those fancy scarfs left?

[chadwhitacre]

@dmk246 has said she's willing to help with writing the thank-you notes. Stickers are #1176.

[chadwhitacre]

Talking this through with @ChrisECJohns ... what about we offer different distribution algorithms at
different levels? I think @andrew was suggesting similarly the other day.

running total ($)	amount ($)	method
100,000	100,000	according to Libraries.io metrics (SourceRank?)
250,000	150,000	voting by companies
500,000	250,000	fellows program
1,000,000	500,000	consortium of non-profits
???	???	???

[mattbk]

I'm a little confused by levels/tiers. You seem to be using them in aggregate rather than per giving company?

[mattbk]

Or is it per-company aggregate? Over multiple campaigns, for example?

[chadwhitacre]

@mattbk Fair enough. I've split out #1184 for rewards, keeping this for overall campaign goals. I guess my thinking is that unlocking things at certain goal levels could incentivize contribution w/o as much overhead as rewards entail.