Radar 31 #389

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this Issue Nov 3, 2015 · 32 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@chadwhitacre
Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 3, 2015

What are you working on this week and why?

last week

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 3, 2015

Contributor

Roadmap (what?)

Short Term

Embarrassments:

Long Term

roadmap

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 3, 2015

Roadmap (what?)

Short Term

Embarrassments:

Long Term

roadmap

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 3, 2015

Contributor

L2 Support 0, Vendors, etc. 0.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 3, 2015

L2 Support 0, Vendors, etc. 0.

@techtonik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@techtonik

techtonik Nov 4, 2015

Contributor

I am joining the land of JavaScript and trying to switch grtp.co to Gulp (which is funded through Gratipay)

Contributor

techtonik commented Nov 4, 2015

I am joining the land of JavaScript and trying to switch grtp.co to Gulp (which is funded through Gratipay)

@techtonik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@techtonik

techtonik Nov 4, 2015

Contributor

@whit537 I need someone to help with upgrading grtp.co to Ubuntu 14.04 - gratipay/grtp.co#106 - because I don't have access to Digital Ocean, I can not see if I can prepare a new node like dev.grtp.co and test that it serves traffic as expected.

Contributor

techtonik commented Nov 4, 2015

@whit537 I need someone to help with upgrading grtp.co to Ubuntu 14.04 - gratipay/grtp.co#106 - because I don't have access to Digital Ocean, I can not see if I can prepare a new node like dev.grtp.co and test that it serves traffic as expected.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 4, 2015

Contributor

@kaguillera and I are thinking through #319. We're hoping to look at Team editing and closing the books for October today as well.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 4, 2015

@kaguillera and I are thinking through #319. We're hoping to look at Team editing and closing the books for October today as well.

@kzisme

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kzisme

kzisme Nov 4, 2015

@whit537 @mattbk here is a user sending an image with undefined receiving(?) amount. He didn't offer anymore information have we come across anything like that before?

kzisme commented Nov 4, 2015

@whit537 @mattbk here is a user sending an image with undefined receiving(?) amount. He didn't offer anymore information have we come across anything like that before?

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mattbk

mattbk Nov 4, 2015

Contributor

gratipay/grtp.co#103

You can add that to embarrassments: It's embarrassing that such a front-facing aspect of the platform is broken.

Contributor

mattbk commented Nov 4, 2015

gratipay/grtp.co#103

You can add that to embarrassments: It's embarrassing that such a front-facing aspect of the platform is broken.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

@mattbk Agreed. Also embarrassing for me is that we don't have our escrow precisely accounted for.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

@mattbk Agreed. Also embarrassing for me is that we don't have our escrow precisely accounted for.

@kzisme

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kzisme

kzisme Nov 5, 2015

At least we are aware of these things and working to improve them rather than being oblivious - one step at a time 🚶

kzisme commented Nov 5, 2015

At least we are aware of these things and working to improve them rather than being oblivious - one step at a time 🚶

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

@kzisme Indeed! 🐢

Also embarrassing for me: the fact that we are at Security 9. We should be running at 0! 😞

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

@kzisme Indeed! 🐢

Also embarrassing for me: the fact that we are at Security 9. We should be running at 0! 😞

@techtonik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@techtonik

techtonik Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

And the reason for that is because Balanced Shutdown + Gratipay 2.0 Model + Gratipay 2.0 Redesign all were happening at the same time in a hurry. Gratipay 1.0 was killed too fast. =)

I also found that I can not receive money in Belarus, so we are trying to work with our offline legal advisers fixing issues with access to actual laws (which appeared to be paid for citizens of my country).

I also added my opinion on #319. Maybe it doesn't propose a consolidated point of view, but Internet was never a place of single voice.

Contributor

techtonik commented Nov 5, 2015

And the reason for that is because Balanced Shutdown + Gratipay 2.0 Model + Gratipay 2.0 Redesign all were happening at the same time in a hurry. Gratipay 1.0 was killed too fast. =)

I also found that I can not receive money in Belarus, so we are trying to work with our offline legal advisers fixing issues with access to actual laws (which appeared to be paid for citizens of my country).

I also added my opinion on #319. Maybe it doesn't propose a consolidated point of view, but Internet was never a place of single voice.

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mattbk

mattbk Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Support momentarily 0.

Contributor

mattbk commented Nov 5, 2015

Support momentarily 0.

@clone1018

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@clone1018

clone1018 Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

I'm working on the planning for the Gratipay Retreat :)

Contributor

clone1018 commented Nov 5, 2015

I'm working on the planning for the Gratipay Retreat :)

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mattbk

mattbk Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Just got an email from Wikipedia asking for donations. Wouldn't it be cool to have them as a Team? 😍
Then I considered that they wouldn't be eligible, because they would choose not to use payroll. Just some thoughts for the morning. Gratipay seems to be focusing on the long tail of teams that are marginally viable but have not established internal financial structures. Is this a problem, or just wherw we want to be?

Contributor

mattbk commented Nov 5, 2015

Just got an email from Wikipedia asking for donations. Wouldn't it be cool to have them as a Team? 😍
Then I considered that they wouldn't be eligible, because they would choose not to use payroll. Just some thoughts for the morning. Gratipay seems to be focusing on the long tail of teams that are marginally viable but have not established internal financial structures. Is this a problem, or just wherw we want to be?

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Over on AspenWeb/pando.py#526, @pjz and I are considering winding down the Aspen project, salvaging the best parts, and relaunching as Simplates. The upshot for Gratipay is that we would need to migrate to Flask (with Simplates as a plugin).

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

Over on AspenWeb/pando.py#526, @pjz and I are considering winding down the Aspen project, salvaging the best parts, and relaunching as Simplates. The upshot for Gratipay is that we would need to migrate to Flask (with Simplates as a plugin).

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mattbk

mattbk Nov 5, 2015

Contributor
Contributor

mattbk commented Nov 5, 2015

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Lunch 0. Coffee 0.5. L2 0, Vendors 0. Inbox 6, GitHub 15.

@kaguillera is working on #390. I'm gonna clear out my GitHub queue and then run payday: #394.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

Lunch 0. Coffee 0.5. L2 0, Vendors 0. Inbox 6, GitHub 15.

@kaguillera is working on #390. I'm gonna clear out my GitHub queue and then run payday: #394.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Wouldn't it be cool to have [Wikipedia] as a Team?

Yes! 💃

Gratipay seems to be focusing on the long tail of teams that are marginally viable but have not established internal financial structures. Is this a problem, or just wherw we want to be?

I would add that we're betting on a few of those long-tail teams turning out to be the next Wikipedias.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

Wouldn't it be cool to have [Wikipedia] as a Team?

Yes! 💃

Gratipay seems to be focusing on the long tail of teams that are marginally viable but have not established internal financial structures. Is this a problem, or just wherw we want to be?

I would add that we're betting on a few of those long-tail teams turning out to be the next Wikipedias.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

And the reason for that is because Balanced Shutdown + Gratipay 2.0 Model + Gratipay 2.0 Redesign all were happening at the same time in a hurry. Gratipay 1.0 was killed too fast. =)

Tell me about it! Serious case of the bends. O.o

Maybe it doesn't propose a consolidated point of view, but Internet was never a place of single voice.

@techtonik True, true. Whether or not we end up publishing something "official" out of #319, I think multiple voices on that ticket are highly welcome. :-)

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

And the reason for that is because Balanced Shutdown + Gratipay 2.0 Model + Gratipay 2.0 Redesign all were happening at the same time in a hurry. Gratipay 1.0 was killed too fast. =)

Tell me about it! Serious case of the bends. O.o

Maybe it doesn't propose a consolidated point of view, but Internet was never a place of single voice.

@techtonik True, true. Whether or not we end up publishing something "official" out of #319, I think multiple voices on that ticket are highly welcome. :-)

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

I'm working on the planning for the Gratipay Retreat :)

!m @clone1018 💃

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

I'm working on the planning for the Gratipay Retreat :)

!m @clone1018 💃

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Blip: I set an alert at Digital Ocean (new feature of theirs I just noticed) when our usage goes over $10.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

Blip: I set an alert at Digital Ocean (new feature of theirs I just noticed) when our usage goes over $10.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Okay! @kaguillera and I are dialing back out of books cleanup (#390) and diving into payday (#394).

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

Okay! @kaguillera and I are dialing back out of books cleanup (#390) and diving into payday (#394).

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mattbk

mattbk Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Wouldn't it be cool to have [Wikipedia] as a Team?

Yes! 💃

Am I right in determining that they wouldn't qualify as a team because they wouldn't be in a position to use Payroll? Don't mean to keep anyone from other things, but this is interesting to me. I suppose that they could use Payroll to pay anyone and everyone who contributes as editors, but that wouldn't really help them sustain the site (that is, they have 300 staff to pay). Maybe I need to take another look at the different Payroll models that have been talked about since 2.0 and see if I can figure this out.

Contributor

mattbk commented Nov 5, 2015

Wouldn't it be cool to have [Wikipedia] as a Team?

Yes! 💃

Am I right in determining that they wouldn't qualify as a team because they wouldn't be in a position to use Payroll? Don't mean to keep anyone from other things, but this is interesting to me. I suppose that they could use Payroll to pay anyone and everyone who contributes as editors, but that wouldn't really help them sustain the site (that is, they have 300 staff to pay). Maybe I need to take another look at the different Payroll models that have been talked about since 2.0 and see if I can figure this out.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Payday 0, GitHub 0, Inbox 6.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

Payday 0, GitHub 0, Inbox 6.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 5, 2015

Contributor

Am I right in determining that they wouldn't qualify as a team because they wouldn't be in a position to use Payroll?

Yeah, probably. :-(

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 5, 2015

Am I right in determining that they wouldn't qualify as a team because they wouldn't be in a position to use Payroll?

Yeah, probably. :-(

@techtonik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@techtonik

techtonik Nov 6, 2015

Contributor

And the reason for that is because Balanced Shutdown + Gratipay 2.0 Model + Gratipay 2.0 Redesign all were happening at the same time in a hurry. Gratipay 1.0 was killed too fast. =)

Tell me about it! Serious case of the bends. O.o

I mean that after new design popped up I no longer can see to who I am donating and graphs. It is all new and clean, but there is no values visible anymore - I'd still prefer to access the same information I had before but in some PAUSED state. Now everything is hidden or malfunctioning, so on the outside it looks polished, but once I login I don't understand anything.

Contributor

techtonik commented Nov 6, 2015

And the reason for that is because Balanced Shutdown + Gratipay 2.0 Model + Gratipay 2.0 Redesign all were happening at the same time in a hurry. Gratipay 1.0 was killed too fast. =)

Tell me about it! Serious case of the bends. O.o

I mean that after new design popped up I no longer can see to who I am donating and graphs. It is all new and clean, but there is no values visible anymore - I'd still prefer to access the same information I had before but in some PAUSED state. Now everything is hidden or malfunctioning, so on the outside it looks polished, but once I login I don't understand anything.

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mattbk

mattbk Nov 6, 2015

Contributor

Gratipay has processed about $999,000 over 3+ years.

Is next week the week? $1,000,000 processed?

Contributor

mattbk commented Nov 6, 2015

Gratipay has processed about $999,000 over 3+ years.

Is next week the week? $1,000,000 processed?

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 6, 2015

Contributor

For the second time! :-)

https://twitter.com/Gratipay/status/576005036926492672

We were somehow counting money differently back then. Overinflating, I guess.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 6, 2015

For the second time! :-)

https://twitter.com/Gratipay/status/576005036926492672

We were somehow counting money differently back then. Overinflating, I guess.

@techtonik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@techtonik

techtonik Nov 6, 2015

Contributor

I'd like Gulp gratipay/grtp.co#108 to be reviewed before going further with migration from Grunt.

Contributor

techtonik commented Nov 6, 2015

I'd like Gulp gratipay/grtp.co#108 to be reviewed before going further with migration from Grunt.

@mattbk

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mattbk

mattbk Nov 6, 2015

Contributor

Do we have any tickets to the effect of "keep fighting for the chance to return to Gratipay 1.0 with regards to donating to individuals? I mean, is there some coalition toward changing financial laws to reflect 21st century monetary practices?

Contributor

mattbk commented Nov 6, 2015

Do we have any tickets to the effect of "keep fighting for the chance to return to Gratipay 1.0 with regards to donating to individuals? I mean, is there some coalition toward changing financial laws to reflect 21st century monetary practices?

@techtonik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@techtonik

techtonik Nov 7, 2015

Contributor

@mattbk my bet that financial and monetary practices are protecting the more complicated system known as "economy" which should also create jobs and supply areas that do not directly benefit any individual, such as science and education. I agree that we need a coalition and a better model. But first, we need a couple of talented d3.js folks to draw existing laws.

Contributor

techtonik commented Nov 7, 2015

@mattbk my bet that financial and monetary practices are protecting the more complicated system known as "economy" which should also create jobs and supply areas that do not directly benefit any individual, such as science and education. I agree that we need a coalition and a better model. But first, we need a couple of talented d3.js folks to draw existing laws.

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre referenced this issue Nov 9, 2015

Closed

Radar 32 #395

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Nov 9, 2015

Contributor

Email (what?)

screen shot 2015-11-09 at 10 15 04 am

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Nov 9, 2015

Email (what?)

screen shot 2015-11-09 at 10 15 04 am

This was referenced Nov 17, 2015

This was referenced Nov 24, 2015

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre referenced this issue Dec 7, 2015

Closed

Radar 36 #429

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre referenced this issue Feb 22, 2016

Closed

Radar 47 #513

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre referenced this issue Mar 1, 2016

Closed

Radar 48 #519

This was referenced Mar 6, 2016

@gratipay-bot gratipay-bot referenced this issue Mar 20, 2016

Closed

Radar 51 #545

This was referenced Mar 27, 2016

@gratipay-bot gratipay-bot referenced this issue Apr 10, 2016

Closed

Radar 54 #571

This was referenced Jul 10, 2016

This was referenced Aug 7, 2016

This was referenced Sep 18, 2016

This was referenced Oct 9, 2016

This was referenced Oct 23, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment