Relation (foreshore) is obscuring a underwater landuse=conservation tag

[ghost]

This property (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271045662) is in shallow tidal marine water that is mostly mudflat at lower tides. This parcel is managed by a state Fish and Wildlife agency. Seems like the landuse=conservation polygon would paint if the foreshore natural=water layer was not on top or could be translucent. The foreshore polygon http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1341207 needs to be shown regardless. Like it is on most topo maps and marine navigational charts. You can see what I mean here:

<iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://www.openstreetmap.org/export/embed.html?bbox=-124.11718368530273%2C40.81874599835864%2C-124.07298088073729%2C40.83891147642241&layer=mapnik&marker=40.82881326765344%2C-124.09508228302002" style="border: 1px solid black"></iframe>
View Larger Map

[matthijsmelissen]

Is this still a problem? What would be the desired behaviour?

[ghost]

Hi math1985,

Sorry that it has taken me so long to reply.

Yes it is still not rendering as a USGS topo map would. Meaning the foreshore ought to be a unique color to denote that it is tidal and land is frequently exposed. Furthermore, this landuse conservation tag us painted under the foreshore tag and hence the blue of the water obscures the green of the conservation tag

Image 1 is an underwater park north of Imperial Beach CA and south of Coronado CA.
Image 2 shows the small portion of the conservation tag
Image 3 shows the boundary of the conservation tag in yellow.

[matthijsmelissen]

Thank you. By the way, you can capture the screen like this: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5775.

[ghost]

Thanks Math1985.