Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences #50

Closed
agitter opened this issue Aug 5, 2016 · 14 comments

Comments

@agitter
Copy link
Collaborator

agitter commented Aug 5, 2016

https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01713

At a glance: A strategy for interpreting neural networks, which could be an important topic in the review. The paper is a technical description of a general method, but one subsection shows an application to genomics and there is more work coming from the Kundaje lab in this direction.

@cgreene cgreene added the paper label Aug 5, 2016
@akundaje
Copy link
Contributor

akundaje commented Aug 8, 2016

We'll have an expanded version of this on Biorxiv in the next few weeks.

@cgreene
Copy link
Member

cgreene commented Aug 8, 2016

@akundaje : Will you post here when it's up? Might put this one on hold & read the new one at the same time.

@akundaje
Copy link
Contributor

akundaje commented Aug 8, 2016

@cgreene Yeah definitely. The current version is extremely succint (had to be that way due to conference format limitations). So the new expanded version will be much easier to read and understand.

@michaelmhoffman
Copy link
Contributor

@akundaje: I just came across your DragoNN web site: http://kundajelab.github.io/dragonn/

Is this the same thing? Or is there another paper for that?

@cgreene
Copy link
Member

cgreene commented Aug 9, 2016

I saw @akundaje give a talk at the Simons Network Biology workshop. It may be
some of that work:
https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks-anshul-kundaje-04-13-16

Side note/shameless plug since I also gave a talk - there's actually a lot
of very nice talks. For all of the ones where the speaker gave permission,
the talks are recorded and available on youtube:
https://simons.berkeley.edu/workshops/schedule/1806

Edit: actually tag people's github names for ease of use.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:16 AM Michael Hoffman notifications@github.com
wrote:

@akundaje https://github.com/akundaje: I just came across your DragoNN
web site: http://kundajelab.github.io/dragonn/

Is this the same thing? Or is there another paper for that?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#50 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAhHs7iwlg9eabKF_I0D-8KYYf93KASlks5qeG-EgaJpZM4JeC43
.

@akundaje
Copy link
Contributor

akundaje commented Aug 9, 2016

@michaelmhoffman We have a different paper in submission for DRAGONN. It'll be up on biorxiv by the weekend. DeepLIFT is provided in DRAGONN for identifying predictive features in the input sequences.

@akundaje
Copy link
Contributor

akundaje commented Aug 9, 2016

@cgreene Yeah the Simon's meeting was really great.

@jbloom22
Copy link

Here is Anshul's Nov 2 presentation on this and related work from the Models, Inference & Algorithms seminar at the Broad Institute.

@akundaje
Copy link
Contributor

@cgreene @agitter Here is our significantly expanded and updated preprint on DeepLIFT https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02685 . Submitted to an ML conference. @AvantiShri made some great videos explaining DeepLIFT here http://goo.gl/qKb7pL . Updated code: http://goo.gl/RM8jvH.

@akundaje
Copy link
Contributor

Also @cgreene @agitter we will finish a draft of the interpretation section by next week.

@agitter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

agitter commented Apr 20, 2017

Thanks @akundaje. @jacklanchantin can you please see if there are changes you'd like to incorporate into your DeepLIFT description?

Regarding interpretation, @blengerich wrote something in #312. I propose moving that to the Discussion so you can use his text as a starting point. I'll make a pull request.

dhimmel added a commit to dhimmel/deep-review that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2017
Fixes issue where manual references were not respected.
@agitter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

agitter commented Mar 13, 2018

The updated version is covered in the Discussion

@agitter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

agitter commented Apr 14, 2018

@traversc noted that this was published in the ICML 2017 proceedings. There is no DOI as far as I can tell:
http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/shrikumar17a.html

@AvantiShri
Copy link
Contributor

That appears to be correct. I suspect PMLR didn't think it needed to purchase DOIs since they have their own identifier system (PMLR 70:3145-3153 in this case).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants