Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Experimental API related to metadata #7298

Closed
KarthikReddyPuli opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #7368
Closed

Experimental API related to metadata #7298

KarthikReddyPuli opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #7368
Assignees

Comments

@KarthikReddyPuli
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to fetch metadata in a more efficient manner and I found an API that is experimental but the PR was ~2 years ago. Can I consider this safe to use now ? Is there any plan on removing the experimental tag on this API and make it permanent ?

PR for reference: #5596

@arjan-bal
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @KarthikReddyPuli, we would like to get feedback before stabilising an experimental API. This helps avoid the risk of needing breaking changes after stabilisation. If users are happy with an experimental API and request it's stabilisation, we will stabilise it.

You can use the ViewFromIncomingContext function and share feedback, if any. The gRPC project still reserves the right to make breaking changes to it, however we don't have any changes planned currently, and don't foresee any in the near future

Copy link

This issue is labeled as requiring an update from the reporter, and no update has been received after 6 days. If no update is provided in the next 7 days, this issue will be automatically closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 11, 2024
@KarthikReddyPuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

KarthikReddyPuli commented Jun 15, 2024

Hi @arjan-bal, thanks for the reply. We have started using this API and we have found considerable improvements in our profiler. I request to stabilise this API in any of the upcoming releases. TIA

@arjan-bal
Copy link
Contributor

Good to know that the API works well.

Assigning to @dfawley to comment on stabilisation of the API.

@dfawley
Copy link
Member

dfawley commented Jun 28, 2024

I don't have any objections.

@KarthikReddyPuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arjan-bal I have raised a PR to stabilise this API, can you please help in review/merging it ?
#7368

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants