Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README.md: Revert reference to protobuf 3.23.4 #10430

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2023

Conversation

ejona86
Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 commented Jul 28, 2023

The README describes the released version of gRPC. But the most recent release doesn't use protobuf 3.23.4. Telling people to use protoc 3.23.4 is asking for breakages because they will be running with protobuf-java 3.22.3, which is a downgrade.

The bump to 3.23.4 was incorrectly done in #10359.

CC @larry-safran

The README describes the released version of gRPC. But the most recent
release doesn't use protobuf 3.23.4. Telling people to use protoc 3.23.4
is asking for breakages because they will be running with protobuf-java
3.22.3, which is a downgrade.

The bump to 3.23.4 was incorrectly done in grpc#10359.
@ejona86 ejona86 requested a review from sergiitk July 28, 2023 21:47
Copy link
Member

@sergiitk sergiitk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh sorry

@sergiitk sergiitk merged commit 4049f89 into grpc:master Aug 3, 2023
6 checks passed
@ejona86 ejona86 deleted the readme-no-proto-upgrade branch August 3, 2023 18:25
larry-safran pushed a commit to larry-safran/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
The README describes the released version of gRPC. But the most recent
release doesn't use protobuf 3.23.4. Telling people to use protoc 3.23.4
is asking for breakages because they will be running with protobuf-java
3.22.3, which is a downgrade.

The bump to 3.23.4 was incorrectly done in grpc#10359.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants