Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Design] Research to validate side-by-side PDF edit experience design concept #250

Open
21 tasks
emilylordahl opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
21 tasks

Comments

@emilylordahl
Copy link
Collaborator

emilylordahl commented Jul 5, 2024

After the PDF(s) have been uploaded, design a view that puts the PDF and edit experience side by side where the PDF view is the primary place where actions take place. The visual of the PDF is familiar and makes the experience approachable. Consider the users are likely to move their attention to the PDF view right away. See exploration.

Other PDF viewer ideations were completed by the team in a design jam session and are available to explore on Mural.

Overview

As a _, I would like _, so that I can _.

Context

Optional: Any reference material or thoughts we may need for later reference, or assumptions of prior or future work that's out of scope for this story.

  • [ ]

Acceptance Criteria

Required outcomes of the story

  • [ ]

Research Questions

  • Optional: Any initial questions for research

Tasks

Research, design, and engineering work needed to complete the story.

  • [ ]

Definition of done

The "definition of done" ensures our quality standards are met with each bit of user-facing behavior we add. Everything that can be done incrementally should be done incrementally, while the context and details are fresh. If it’s inefficient or “hard” to do so, the team should figure out why and add OPEX/DEVEX backlog items to make it easier and more efficient.

  • Behavior
    • Acceptance criteria met
    • Implementation matches design decisions
  • Documentation
    • ADRs (/documents/adr folder)
    • Relevant README.md(s)
  • Code quality
    • Code refactored for clarity and no design/technical debt
    • Adhere to separation of concerns; code is not tightly coupled, especially to 3rd party dependencies; dependency rule followed
    • Code is reviewed by team member
    • Code quality checks passed
  • Security and privacy
    • Automated security and privacy gates passed
  • Testing tasks completed
    • Automated tests pass
    • Unit test coverage of our code >= 90%
  • Build and deploy
    • Build process updated
    • API(s) are versioned
    • Feature toggles created and/or deleted. Document the feature toggle
    • Source code is merged to the main branch

Decisions

  • Optional: Any decisions we've made while working on this story
@emilylordahl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jimmoffet This issue was added as a result of the UX Concept testing in #116 . It needs further refinement and prioritization.

UX considers this a major feature/issue due to it coming up with a majority of participants. Review details from the research in the research report.

@JennyRichards-Flexion
Copy link
Collaborator

9/6/24: In conversation with Jim, this item is MEDIUM priority.

@JennyRichards-Flexion JennyRichards-Flexion changed the title As a form author, I need to work off a PDF that is visible and actionable so that I can start from a place of familiarity. [design] Research to validate side-by-side PDF edit experience design concept Oct 15, 2024
@JennyRichards-Flexion
Copy link
Collaborator

Could this be folded into the usability tests?

@JennyRichards-Flexion JennyRichards-Flexion changed the title [design] Research to validate side-by-side PDF edit experience design concept [Design] Research to validate side-by-side PDF edit experience design concept Oct 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants