Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sharing raw subjective ratings (or MOS + variance per image) #18

Closed
subpic opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Sharing raw subjective ratings (or MOS + variance per image) #18

subpic opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@subpic
Copy link

subpic commented Nov 29, 2021

Hello,

I was wondering if you provided the raw ratings obtained in the experiment (rating corresponding to each user and image)? If these are not available, would it be possible to have access to the variance of the ratings for each image? It would help compare the reliability of the subjective experiment to that of other studies.

Thanks,
Vlad

@h4nwei
Copy link
Owner

h4nwei commented Dec 6, 2021

Dear Vlad,

We have made the standard deviation available on the MEGA. I hope it is useful to you.

Best,
Hanwei

@subpic
Copy link
Author

subpic commented Dec 7, 2021

Dear Hanwei,

Thanks a lot for sharing the additional metadata! :)

I understand the SPAQ study was done in the lab, so the standard deviations should be low, but I found that 5 images have a standard deviation of 0 (06797.jpg, 06841.jpg, 06858.jpg, 07234.jpg, 07264.jpg). It means that at least 15 participants provided the exact same rating for each of those images. Given the 100 point scale used, this is very unlikely. Could you please help me check if that is really the case, or maybe there is something I missed or interpreted wrong?

SPAQ dataset - Std vs MOS

Thanks,
Vlad

@h4nwei
Copy link
Owner

h4nwei commented Dec 7, 2021

Dear Vlad,

Thank you for bringing it to our attention. I believe it contains several errors. I'll double-check everything and get back to you as soon as possible.

Best,
Hanwei

@h4nwei
Copy link
Owner

h4nwei commented Dec 9, 2021

Dear Hanwei,

Thanks a lot for sharing the additional metadata! :)

I understand the SPAQ study was done in the lab, so the standard deviations should be low, but I found that 5 images have a standard deviation of 0 (06797.jpg, 06841.jpg, 06858.jpg, 07234.jpg, 07264.jpg). It means that at least 15 participants provided the exact same rating for each of those images. Given the 100 point scale used, this is very unlikely. Could you please help me check if that is really the case, or maybe there is something I missed or interpreted wrong?

SPAQ dataset - Std vs MOS

Thanks, Vlad

Dear Vlad,

The revised standard deviation of each image is uploaded to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RxLsGq_3SPTkL3XVz6FlQJpPdjdavcwB/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=116447340964909555823&rtpof=true&sd=true. Thanks for pointing out it again.

Best,
Hanwei

@subpic
Copy link
Author

subpic commented Dec 11, 2021

Thanks, Hanwei! :)

@h4nwei h4nwei closed this as completed Feb 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants