Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove deprecated File.fid attribute #1378

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2019
Merged

Conversation

takluyver
Copy link
Member

File.id works instead. This has been described as "backwards compatibility" in the docstring since 2.0, and issued deprecation warnings since 2.9 (gh-1047).

File.id works instead. This has been described as "backwards compatibility"
in the docstring since 2.0, and issued deprecation warnings since 2.9 (h5pygh-1047).
@takluyver takluyver added this to the 3.0 milestone Oct 4, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1378 into master will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1378      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.24%   84.21%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        2056     2052       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         1732     1728       -4     
  Misses        324      324
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
h5py/_hl/files.py 95.67% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9ed8811...146d60e. Read the comment docs.

@aragilar
Copy link
Member

aragilar commented Oct 6, 2019

The only failure is a very small coverage change, and given we're had this deprecated forever, I'm going to merge this. Thanks @takluyver!

@aragilar aragilar merged commit 3a0155d into h5py:master Oct 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants