Updating Guide Issues

[edwardsarah]

Overview

Guide Issues Need to be Replaced with new format for instructions

Action Items

Review guide issues across CoPs and identify all of the issues that are in the gather examples phase.
Update them with the new instructions

Resources/Instructions

https://github.com/hackforla/guides/wiki/How-to-Gather-Examples

[edwardsarah]

Instructions might look something like:

• Gather Examples
• Write Your Guide
• Have Your Guide Peer Reviewed
• Submit Your Guide for Leadership Review

I'll work on temp pages for now and we can go back and edit them as the decks are finished. Peer Review & Leadership Review are just temp pages right now
Add wiki page explaining trail closed, only add gather examples stuff to issues.

[edwardsarah]

Simplify & make it as clear as possible

Milestones

• Phase: 1-Gather Examples
  • has been replaced with labels
• Trail Closed (Everything Beyond Gather Examples)
• Phase: 2-Drafting a Guide
  • has been replaced with labels (phase 3)
• Phase: 3-Peer Level 1 Review (other people at CoP)
  • has been replaced with labels (phase 4)
• CoP Guides Review (someone who has gone through gather examples training)
  • has been replaced with labels (phase 4, level 2)
• Leadership Review (random sampling)
  • has been replaced with labels (phase 5)
• Ready to Publish (guides team says it's ready
  • has been replaced with labels (phase 6)
• Published

(formerly milestones) now cleanup (expected to be one time)

• Needs to be Triaged
  • Guides team project board cleanup on CoP
• Issue Rewrite Required
  • old template
  • too broad
  • unclear what its about

Work Status

• Prioritized Backlog (nobody owns the issue)
• In Progress (someone is working on this issue, either gathering examples, writing the guide, or rewriting the guide)
• Ready for Review (needs a peer reviewer or leadership review, depending on label?)
• Being Reviewed
• Questions (for CoP leads or guides team)
• Done (issue is closed, nobody else is going to work on it, which means it's on the website)

Ready for review & ready for rewrites important to highlight guides that are transitioning from one person to another. Either from writer to reviewer, or reviewer to writer.

• labels for CoP lead review & guides team if there's something they need to look at, regardless of column.

Labels:

Phase: 1-Gather Examples Solo

• status: needs wiki examples
• status: needs project board examples
• status: needs issues examples
• status: needs slack examples

Phase: 2-Gather Examples Collaborative

• status: needs communication with teams
• status: needs special issue/check with admin (is this an optional label)

Phase: 3-Drafting a Guide

• status: 3.1 needs draft
• status: 3.2 unfinished draft
• status: 3.3 needs template
  (is it important to discuss labels for this now? should we just focus on the gather examples labels?)

Phase: 4-CoP Peer Review

• status: 4.1 needs peer review level 1*
• status: 4.1 needs peer review level 2*
  *labels assigned based on what you need
• status: 4.2 needs edits (after completing edits, repeat 4.1)
• status: 4.3 sign off by peers

Phase: 5-Leadership Review

• status: 5.1 needs CoP leads review
• status: 5.2 needs edits (after completing edits, repeat 5.1)
• status: 5.3 sign off by CoP leads
• status: 5.4 needs guides team review

Phase: 6-Ready to Publish

• status: needs staging

[ExperimentsInHonesty]

Milestones

01 Compliance
02 Security
03 Project Management
04 Team Workflow
05.01 HfLA Guides: MVP knowledge
05.02 HfLA Guides: All teams do
05.03 HfLA Guides: Some teams do
05.04. HfLA Guides: We Must Do in future
05.05 HfLA Guides: We Should Do in future
05.06 HfLA Guides: We Could Do in future
05.07 HfLA Guides: We Won't Do in future unless something changes
Lightning Talks
Speaker
Mentor Night
Open Networking

[edwardsarah]

Example issue with new template
hackforla/knowledgebase-content#24

[edwardsarah]

Work status, milestones, and labels (through phase 4) have been added to knowledgebase-content repo & project board. held off on additional labels until we confirm the leadership review process