Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance: Refactor JS files to exclude babel #112

Closed
abregorivas opened this issue May 21, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Performance: Refactor JS files to exclude babel #112

abregorivas opened this issue May 21, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
Feature Missing This label means that the issue needs to be linked to a precise feature label. good first issue Good for newcomers HOLD Not ready to be worked on yet size: missing Status: Urgent Needs to be worked on immediately
Projects
Project Board

Comments

@abregorivas
Copy link
Member

abregorivas commented May 21, 2019 •
edited

Light house test shows that we could improve our performance by not using babel CDN.
Need the following:
@abregorivas abregorivas added the enhancement New feature or request suggestion label May 21, 2019
@abregorivas abregorivas added this to Ice Box in Survey Comparison Board via automation May 21, 2019
@abregorivas abregorivas moved this from Ice Box to Prioritized Backlog in Survey Comparison Board May 21, 2019
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added good first issue Good for newcomers Status: Urgent Needs to be worked on immediately UI and removed enhancement New feature or request suggestion labels May 27, 2019
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty changed the title Performance: Refactor and combine JS files to exclude babel Performance: Refactor JS files to exclude babel May 27, 2019
Closed
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added the HOLD Not ready to be worked on yet label Jun 4, 2019
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty moved this from Prioritized Backlog to Ice Box in Survey Comparison Board Jun 4, 2019
Survey Comparison Board automation moved this from Ice Box to Done Jun 6, 2019
@abregorivas
Copy link
Member Author

Pull request for issue#125 moved babel file to body vs having in head. Improved performance.

@harishlingam harishlingam added this to Ice box in Project Board via automation Mar 30, 2020
@harishlingam harishlingam moved this from Ice box to Done in Project Board Mar 30, 2020
@Providence-o Providence-o removed this from Done in Project Board Mar 8, 2022
@Providence-o Providence-o added this to Done in Issues Closed 13 months or more via automation Mar 8, 2022
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added the Feature Missing This label means that the issue needs to be linked to a precise feature label. label Aug 13, 2023
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added the APBMDA Move issue to project board, Move to Done, Archive label May 8, 2024
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added this to New Issue Approval in Project Board via automation Jun 9, 2024
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty moved this from New Issue Approval to Done in Project Board Jun 9, 2024
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty removed the APBMDA Move issue to project board, Move to Done, Archive label Jun 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Feature Missing This label means that the issue needs to be linked to a precise feature label. good first issue Good for newcomers HOLD Not ready to be worked on yet size: missing Status: Urgent Needs to be worked on immediately
Projects
HfLA Website: Project Board
Archived in project
Project Board
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@abregorivas @ExperimentsInHonesty @Josiah-O