Add option to "sortby" in caprieval

[rvhonorato]

I re-implemented the output function because life is better with pandas 🐼

---

This closes #153.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #182 (aee955b) into main (4680da1) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 3.89%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #182      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.09%   41.17%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        2280     2278       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits          937      938       +1     
+ Misses       1343     1340       -3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/haddock/modules/analysis/caprieval/__init__.py	12.32% <3.89%> (+0.42%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4680da1...aee955b. Read the comment docs.

[amjjbonvin]

Nice option!

[joaomcteixeira]

I actually strongly disagree we add pandas to the requirements. It's a very heavy dependency that we need to manage on top of everything and breaks one of the features we are working hard to have in haddock3, which is having a lightweight python-shell that people can install to use haddock3's features in servers or locally without the need to install the simulation machinery while keeping everything lightweight. I would do an internal sorting function.

[rvhonorato]

Reverted on #184 and reopened #153