You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a discussion (on pg 129) including the quote:
one day I hope to add 3d graphics too.
Given that ggplot2 is now in maintenance mode, could/should this package be rephrased?
I don't know if this is the place for the larger discussion on the dangers of 3d. As I understand the arguement, 3d is a great way to hide difficult parts of your data, accidentally or otherwise. I remember one talk Hadley gave that touched on using heuristics, such as size and layering, to give the impression of 3d while still respecting the two dimensions being shown.
I don't know, as well, if this is a good place (or if there is a good place) to talk about some common graphing techniques, such as 2nd y-axis, or 3d, that (by definition) are contrary to grammar-of-graphics, and what grammar-of-graphics techniques can be used to convey the same information, perhaps not quite as concisely, but with less abiguity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From @ijlyttle:
There is a discussion (on pg 129) including the quote:
Given that ggplot2 is now in maintenance mode, could/should this package be rephrased?
I don't know if this is the place for the larger discussion on the dangers of 3d. As I understand the arguement, 3d is a great way to hide difficult parts of your data, accidentally or otherwise. I remember one talk Hadley gave that touched on using heuristics, such as size and layering, to give the impression of 3d while still respecting the two dimensions being shown.
I don't know, as well, if this is a good place (or if there is a good place) to talk about some common graphing techniques, such as 2nd y-axis, or 3d, that (by definition) are contrary to grammar-of-graphics, and what grammar-of-graphics techniques can be used to convey the same information, perhaps not quite as concisely, but with less abiguity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: