Revise bundling recommendations slightly

license.Rmd

@@ -235,13 +235,7 @@ There are five main cases to consider:
 
 -   If your license and their license are the same: it's OK to bundle.
 
--   If their license is permissive, it's OK to bundle.
-    (One important exception is that Apache License 2.0 is only compatible with GPLv3, not GPLv2).
-
--   If both licenses are copyleft licenses (but not the same), you'll need to do a little research.
-    Wikipedia has a [useful diagram](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility#Compatibility_of_FOSS_licenses) and Google is your friend.
-    It's important to note that different versions of the same license are not necessarily compatible, e.g.
-    GPLv2 and GPLv3 are not compatible.
+-   If their license is MIT or BSD, it's OK to bundle.
 
 -   If their code has a copyleft license and your code has a permissive license, you can't bundle their code.
     You'll need to consider an alternative approach, either looking for code with a more permissive license, or putting the external code in a separate package.
@@ -250,6 +244,11 @@ There are five main cases to consider:
     . This means that you need to take extra care when using Stack Overflow code in open source packages
     . Learn more at <https://empirical-software.engineering/blog/so-snippets-in-gh-projects>.
 
+-   Otherwise, you'll need to do a little research.
+    Wikipedia has a [useful diagram](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility#Compatibility_of_FOSS_licenses) and Google is your friend.
+    It's important to note that different versions of the same license are not necessarily compatible, e.g.
+    GPLv2 and GPLv3 are not compatible.
+
 [^license-5]: <https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing>
 
 [^license-6]: <https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/compatible-licenses/>