You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since allowable stall clues was changed recently, there are few things unclear:
Finesse position exception means that often 5 stall is performed when a player is forced to give a clue and there's a single playable unclued card in someone's finesse position.
However, when player is forced to give a clue and cannot give normal play or save clue AND cannot 5-stall, then in the documents, it's not clear what has higher priority:
Cluing card on a finesse position, disregarding finesse position exception
Or giving a tempo clue?
Also, according to changes, when player is forced to give a clue, are players allowed to give a fix clue (even if there are no cards being in immediate danger of misplaying) in order to prevent resorting to 5-stall?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since allowable stall clues was changed recently, there are few things unclear:
Finesse position exception means that often 5 stall is performed when a player is forced to give a clue and there's a single playable unclued card in someone's finesse position.
However, when player is forced to give a clue and cannot give normal play or save clue AND cannot 5-stall, then in the documents, it's not clear what has higher priority:
Cluing card on a finesse position, disregarding finesse position exception
Or giving a tempo clue?
Also, according to changes, when player is forced to give a clue, are players allowed to give a fix clue (even if there are no cards being in immediate danger of misplaying) in order to prevent resorting to 5-stall?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: