Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No equal sign #85

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 21, 2015
Merged

No equal sign #85

merged 4 commits into from
May 21, 2015

Conversation

pierot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierot pierot commented May 19, 2015

Pull request for functionality described here: #79 (comment)

@scharf
Copy link
Contributor

scharf commented May 19, 2015

Looks good, but I am afraid this change will break a lot of existing code. I think it would be best to hide this feature behind an option (like strictNullHandling)

@tunnckoCore
Copy link

I think it would be best to hide this feature behind an option

👍

@nlf
Copy link
Collaborator

nlf commented May 20, 2015

This definitely needs to be behind an option. To prove it doesn't break backwards compatibility make sure you leave existing tests untouched, and only add new tests.

@pierot
Copy link
Contributor Author

pierot commented May 21, 2015

I updated the PR with the option strictNullHandling.

@nlf nlf self-assigned this May 21, 2015
@nlf nlf added this to the 3.0.0 milestone May 21, 2015
nlf added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2015
@nlf nlf merged commit bb89b5f into ljharb:master May 21, 2015
@pierot pierot deleted the no-equal-sign branch May 21, 2015 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants