Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: LeakyContractTestsSuite test with top-level signatures #10486

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 13, 2023

Conversation

stoyanov-st
Copy link
Contributor

Description:
As per this comment #10287 (review)
The tests requiring top-level signatures are commented

Related issue(s):

Fixes #9392
Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

  • Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
  • Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

Signed-off-by: Stanimir Stoyanov <stanimir.stoyanov@limechain.tech>
@stoyanov-st stoyanov-st added the Limechain Work planned for the LimeChain team label Dec 13, 2023
@stoyanov-st stoyanov-st self-assigned this Dec 13, 2023
@stoyanov-st stoyanov-st marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2023 16:11
@stoyanov-st stoyanov-st requested review from a team as code owners December 13, 2023 16:11
Copy link

Node: HAPI Test (Token) Results

189 tests   189 ✔️  16m 50s ⏱️
  13 suites      0 💤
  13 files        0

Results for commit 84129cd.

Copy link

Node: HAPI Test (Crypto) Results

211 tests   201 ✔️  16m 27s ⏱️
  22 suites    10 💤
  22 files        0

Results for commit 84129cd.

Copy link

Node: Unit Test Results

    2 291 files  ±0      2 291 suites  ±0   52m 19s ⏱️ +39s
118 429 tests ±0  118 395 ✔️ ±0  34 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
126 850 runs  ±0  126 816 ✔️ ±0  34 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 84129cd. ± Comparison against base commit f5e85f4.

Copy link

Node: HAPI Test (Misc) Results

420 tests   319 ✔️  24m 5s ⏱️
  74 suites  101 💤
  74 files        0

Results for commit 84129cd.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (45632ac) 63.01% compared to head (84129cd) 63.02%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop   #10486   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      63.01%   63.02%           
- Complexity     30804    30809    +5     
==========================================
  Files           3360     3360           
  Lines         135346   135346           
  Branches       14088    14088           
==========================================
+ Hits           85289    85301   +12     
+ Misses         46695    46689    -6     
+ Partials        3362     3356    -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Node: E2E Test Results

    1 files      1 suites   23m 14s ⏱️
311 tests 311 ✔️ 0 💤 0
333 runs  333 ✔️ 0 💤 0

Results for commit 84129cd.

Copy link

Node: HAPI Test (Time Consuming) Results

21 tests     9 ✔️  24m 52s ⏱️
  2 suites  12 💤
  2 files      0

Results for commit 84129cd.

Copy link

Node: Integration Test Results

279 tests   279 ✔️  27m 58s ⏱️
    5 suites      0 💤
    5 files        0

Results for commit 84129cd.

Copy link

Node: HAPI Test (Smart Contract) Results

398 tests   357 ✔️  45m 16s ⏱️
  55 suites    41 💤
  55 files        0

Results for commit 84129cd.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, we may want to extract these tests into a separate suite? (@netopyr?)

@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj merged commit b2411f9 into develop Dec 13, 2023
41 checks passed
@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj deleted the 09392-fix-leaky-contract-hapi-tests branch December 13, 2023 19:01
@netopyr
Copy link
Contributor

netopyr commented Dec 13, 2023

Yes, please move the tests to another class similar to other cases where we had tests depending on the legacy security model. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Limechain Work planned for the LimeChain team
Projects
None yet
3 participants