Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: restrict the number of E2E jobs that can run in parallel #673

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

jeromy-cannon
Copy link
Contributor

@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon commented Oct 11, 2024

Description

This pull request changes the following:

  • restrict the number of E2E jobs that can run in parallel

Related Issues

@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon self-assigned this Oct 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Unit Test Results - Linux

  1 files  ±0   40 suites  ±0   6s ⏱️ ±0s
112 tests ±0  112 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
124 runs  ±0  124 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 776ebe7. ± Comparison against base commit 2c39105.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Unit Test Results - Windows

  1 files  ±0   40 suites  ±0   20s ⏱️ ±0s
112 tests ±0  112 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
124 runs  ±0  124 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 776ebe7. ± Comparison against base commit 2c39105.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2024

E2E Test Report

0 tests   0 ✅  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 776ebe7.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 2c391051
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (2c39105) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (776ebe7) 14237 9575 67.25%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#673) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.14%. Comparing base (65a1b53) to head (776ebe7).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #673      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.15%   66.14%   -3.02%     
==========================================
  Files          40       38       -2     
  Lines       14560    14237     -323     
  Branches      779      674     -105     
==========================================
- Hits        10069     9417     -652     
- Misses       4444     4761     +317     
- Partials       47       59      +12     

see 18 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon force-pushed the 00339-e2e-jobs-parallel-restriction branch from a20cf9e to 07085e4 Compare October 11, 2024 14:06
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeromy Cannon <jeromy@swirldslabs.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@rbarkerSL rbarkerSL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but a few minor comments

@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon merged commit dfa3cf0 into main Oct 11, 2024
38 of 39 checks passed
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon deleted the 00339-e2e-jobs-parallel-restriction branch October 11, 2024 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Restrict the number of E2E jobs that can run in parallel
2 participants