Fix SAN matching on terminating gateways #20417
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hashi-derek
added
backport/1.16
hashi-derek
force-pushed
the
derem/fix-gh-20360
branch
from
d0dc8fd
to
64dd94f
Compare
Fixes issue: #20360 A regression was introduced in #19954 where the SAN validation matching was reduced from 4 potential types down to just the URI. Terminating gateways will need to match on many fields depending on user configuration, since they make egress calls outside of the cluster. Having more than one matcher behaves like an OR operation, where any match is sufficient to pass the certificate validation. To maintain backwards compatibility with the old untyped `match_subject_alt_names` Envoy behavior, we should match on all 4 enum types. https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/extensions/transport_sockets/tls/v3/common.proto#enum-extensions-transport-sockets-tls-v3-subjectaltnamematcher-santype
hashi-derek
force-pushed
the
derem/fix-gh-20360
branch
from
64dd94f
to
434103c
Compare
jmurret
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2024
This was referenced Jan 31, 2024
hashi-derek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
Fixes issue: #20360 A regression was introduced in #19954 where the SAN validation matching was reduced from 4 potential types down to just the URI. Terminating gateways will need to match on many fields depending on user configuration, since they make egress calls outside of the cluster. Having more than one matcher behaves like an OR operation, where any match is sufficient to pass the certificate validation. To maintain backwards compatibility with the old untyped `match_subject_alt_names` Envoy behavior, we should match on all 4 enum types. https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/extensions/transport_sockets/tls/v3/common.proto#enum-extensions-transport-sockets-tls-v3-subjectaltnamematcher-santype
hashi-derek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
Fixes issue: #20360 A regression was introduced in #19954 where the SAN validation matching was reduced from 4 potential types down to just the URI. Terminating gateways will need to match on many fields depending on user configuration, since they make egress calls outside of the cluster. Having more than one matcher behaves like an OR operation, where any match is sufficient to pass the certificate validation. To maintain backwards compatibility with the old untyped `match_subject_alt_names` Envoy behavior, we should match on all 4 enum types. https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/extensions/transport_sockets/tls/v3/common.proto#enum-extensions-transport-sockets-tls-v3-subjectaltnamematcher-santype
hashi-derek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
…6.x (#20418) Fix SAN matching on terminating gateways (#20417) Fixes issue: #20360 A regression was introduced in #19954 where the SAN validation matching was reduced from 4 potential types down to just the URI. Terminating gateways will need to match on many fields depending on user configuration, since they make egress calls outside of the cluster. Having more than one matcher behaves like an OR operation, where any match is sufficient to pass the certificate validation. To maintain backwards compatibility with the old untyped `match_subject_alt_names` Envoy behavior, we should match on all 4 enum types. https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/extensions/transport_sockets/tls/v3/common.proto#enum-extensions-transport-sockets-tls-v3-subjectaltnamematcher-santype Co-authored-by: Derek Menteer <105233703+hashi-derek@users.noreply.github.com>
hashi-derek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
…7.x (#20419) Fix SAN matching on terminating gateways (#20417) Fixes issue: #20360 A regression was introduced in #19954 where the SAN validation matching was reduced from 4 potential types down to just the URI. Terminating gateways will need to match on many fields depending on user configuration, since they make egress calls outside of the cluster. Having more than one matcher behaves like an OR operation, where any match is sufficient to pass the certificate validation. To maintain backwards compatibility with the old untyped `match_subject_alt_names` Envoy behavior, we should match on all 4 enum types. https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/extensions/transport_sockets/tls/v3/common.proto#enum-extensions-transport-sockets-tls-v3-subjectaltnamematcher-santype Co-authored-by: Derek Menteer <105233703+hashi-derek@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes issue: #20360
A regression was introduced in #19954 where the SAN validation matching was reduced from 4 potential types down to just the URI.
Terminating gateways will need to match on many fields depending on user configuration, since they make egress calls outside of the cluster. Having more than one matcher behaves like an OR operation, where any match is sufficient to pass the certificate validation. To maintain backwards compatibility with the old untyped
match_subject_alt_namesEnvoy behavior, we should match on all 4 enum types.https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/api-v3/extensions/transport_sockets/tls/v3/common.proto#enum-extensions-transport-sockets-tls-v3-subjectaltnamematcher-santype