-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This host does not support "Intel EPT" hardware assisted MMU virtualization. #9242
Comments
Hi @mohanr thanks for reaching out. I'm not entirely sure if this is more of a VMWare configuration issue then it is a Packer thing. But this issue #5754 may help in answering your question around Have you tried reaching out to the community forums? For help with this kind of initial configuration, the mailing list or community forum are generally more useful. Issues opened here on the Packer issue tracker are only viewed by a small handful of developers who work on the tool, and we don't always have the most depth or experience when it comes to custom issues with particular build configurations. |
I have asked the Google groups. |
I'm using VMware Workstation on Arch Linux and noticed that the |
|
I will suggest you install the packer directly on windows machine - OS or WSL. Intialize the "vmware/esxi" vagrant box and run your desired CentOS VM there.
Samuel Nwoye"There is only one good knowledge; one evil ignorance."
On Sunday, June 7, 2020, 03:59:14 AM GMT+1, Mohan Radhakrishnan <notifications@github.com> wrote:
I have VirtualBox and a guest Ubuntu OS. Inside that I use packer and VMWare Workstation to build a CentOS VM.
Just clarifying. I have a Windows host and on that I have VirtualBox and a guest Ubuntu OS. Inside that Ubuntu OS I use packer and VMWare Workstation to build a CentOS VM. So there is a host and VirtualBox and Ubuntu and inside that I have VMWare Workstation( CentOS VM ).
This layering could be an issue. I wonder.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
This issue has been automatically migrated to hashicorp/packer-plugin-vmware#10 because it looks like an issue with that plugin. If you believe this is not an issue with the plugin, please reply to hashicorp/packer-plugin-vmware#10. |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
Overview of the Issue
I have VirtualBox and a guest Ubuntu OS. Inside that I use packer and VMWare Workstation to build a CentOS VM.
I think this could be a problem because there is already a virtualized environment. I may have identified this and the
vmware.log
shows the problem..Is this even possible to do ? I do set
"monitor.allowLegacyCPU": "true"
.If this is not possible due to some nested virtualization requirement I can use the Windows subsystem for Linux but again that could pose the same problem.
Is packer's legacy CPU switch the right one or not ?
Packer version
From
packer version
Simplified Packer Buildfile
Operating system and Environment details
Host OS is Windows 10 Pro and VirtualBox and a guest Ubuntu OS
Log Fragments and crash.log files
vmware.log
2020-05-16T10:15:54.382+05:30| vmx| I125: ToolsISO: Updated cached value for imageName to 'linux.iso'.
2020-05-16T10:15:54.382+05:30| vmx| I125: ToolsISO: Selected Tools ISO 'linux.iso' for 'centos-64' guest.
2020-05-16T10:15:54.390+05:30| vmx| I125: Vix: [mainDispatch.c:4215]: VMAutomation_ReportPowerOpFinished: statevar=1, newAppState=1873, success=1 additionalError=0
2020-05-16T10:15:54.405+05:30| vmx| I125: Module 'CPUIDEarly' power on failed.
2020-05-16T10:15:54.405+05:30| vmx| I125: VMX_PowerOn: ModuleTable_PowerOn = 0
2020-05-16T10:15:54.407+05:30| vmx| I125: Vix: [mainDispatch.c:4215]: VMAutomation_ReportPowerOpFinished: statevar=1, newAppState=1873, success=1 additionalError=0
2020-05-16T10:15:54.414+05:30| vmx| I125:
2020-05-16T10:15:54.414+05:30| vmx| I125+ Power on failure messages: This host does not support Intel VT-x.
2020-05-16T10:15:54.414+05:30| vmx| I125+ This host does not support "Intel EPT" hardware assisted MMU virtualization.
2020-05-16T10:15:54.414+05:30| vmx| I125+ Module 'CPUIDEarly' power on failed.
2020-05-16T10:15:54.414+05:30| vmx| I125+ Failed to start the virtual machine.
2020-05-16T10:15:54.414+05:30| vmx| I125+
2020-05-16T10:15:54.415+05:30| vmx| I125: Vix: [mainDispatch.c:4215]: VMAutomation_ReportPowerOpFinished: statevar=0, newAppState=1870, success=1 additionalError=0
2020-05-16T10:15:54.415+05:30| vmx| I125: Transitioned vmx/execState/val to poweredOff
2020-05-16T10:15:54.421+05:30| vmx| I125: Vix: [mainDispatch.c:4215]: VMAutomation_ReportPowerOpFinished: statevar=0, newAppState=1870, success=0 additionalError=0
2020-05-16T10:15:54.421+05:30| vmx| I125: Vix: [mainDispatch.c:4253]: Error VIX_E_FAIL in VMAutomation_ReportPowerOpFinished(): Unknown error
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: