Backport support for generic hostname to backend/remote #32610
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
brandonc
deleted the
TF-4115-backport-generic-hostname-configuration-in-cli-to-backend-remote
branch
|
Reminder for the merging maintainer: if this is a user-visible change, please update the changelog on the appropriate release branch. |
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Duplicates generic hostname enhancement to backend/remote. We don't have a history of sharing code between the cloud and remote backends and this was a very small change so I basically duplicated #32571
My thinking is that this enhancement falls close to being a bug fix so it might not be worthwhile to insist on a migration to cloud backend to get it. I'm open to either a different implementation that shares code or not backporting it at all.
Target Release
1.4.0