You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to reproduce you're results as indicated in the Feature_Selection_reg notebook but am finding that I'm getting slightly different results starting with running X=cmns.drop_high_vif(df_reduced,thresh=5) on line 130, even though I'm using the same BTC_Data_736_features_raw.csv file that was available in commit b80f8913e0. My guess is this is coming from slightly different versions of Python (I'm running 3.8) and related packages compared to what was in your manuscript.
Do you have an Anaconda environment (or other virtualenv) file from your original workflow that can be shared, so I can better understand how these discrepancies are arising?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I'm trying to reproduce you're results as indicated in the
Feature_Selection_reg
notebook but am finding that I'm getting slightly different results starting with runningX=cmns.drop_high_vif(df_reduced,thresh=5)
on line130
, even though I'm using the sameBTC_Data_736_features_raw.csv
file that was available in commit b80f8913e0. My guess is this is coming from slightly different versions of Python (I'm running 3.8) and related packages compared to what was in your manuscript.Do you have an Anaconda environment (or other virtualenv) file from your original workflow that can be shared, so I can better understand how these discrepancies are arising?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: