Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support dynamic --api-versions and --kube-version in template #11240

Closed
howardjohn opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Support dynamic --api-versions and --kube-version in template #11240

howardjohn opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@howardjohn
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, helm template takes --api-versions and --kube-version, which is great for use with charts that depend on these values.

It is also, IMO, a good idea that these field are not auto-populated on helm template by default. However, when we do want them populated, manually inputting them is painful.

It would be nice to add a flag to auto detect this (same as helm install). This would be useful for cases like helm template --detect-kube-version | kubectl apply -f - or equivalent, where we already know the cluster we are going to apply to eventually.

howardjohn added a commit to howardjohn/istio that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2022
This allows `manifest generate` to use cluster specific settings as
well.

The only install method left is `helm template`; I have a bug filed in
helm/helm#11240.
istio-testing pushed a commit to istio/istio that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2022
This allows `manifest generate` to use cluster specific settings as
well.

The only install method left is `helm template`; I have a bug filed in
helm/helm#11240.
mt-inside pushed a commit to mt-inside/istio that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2022
This allows `manifest generate` to use cluster specific settings as
well.

The only install method left is `helm template`; I have a bug filed in
helm/helm#11240.
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2022

This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity. This thread will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 8, 2022
@howardjohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not stale

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity. This thread will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs.

@howardjohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think its still useful personally but cannot re-open. Maybe will find some time to submit a PR to revive this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants