You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is not is there any combined data set model. I am looking to classify EEG using transfer learning. But my query is that, all of your model are trained on seprate data set and have seprate weights.
Is not there any sort of cobined weight and architecture. Like we have in computer vision.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I understood correctly, I would recommend checking out the work on domain adaptation maybe or semi-supervised learning , maybe this is a starting point.
Unlike computer vision, we do not have repositories of millions of annotated time series. Thus, the creation of a unique pre-trained model suitable for all applications is still an open issue for time series classification.
My advice would be use our method to compare your dataset to available UCR datasets (as described in our paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.01533) and to fine tune the most similar one with your data. My first guess would be the three ECG datasets of the UCR archive.
Is not is there any combined data set model. I am looking to classify EEG using transfer learning. But my query is that, all of your model are trained on seprate data set and have seprate weights.
Is not there any sort of cobined weight and architecture. Like we have in computer vision.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: