-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/asciidocs #1207
Feature/asciidocs #1207
Conversation
…o chapters of the mapping docs
…s, notes and tip sections
- Database_Access.adoc - Transactions.adoc - JNDI.adoc - Locking.adoc - Fetching.adoc - Batching.adoc
- Caching.adoc - Events.adoc
…n, natural_id sections
The tests (54) could go into one commit, for instance. Those are located in the hibernate-entitymanager (hibernate-entitymanager/src/test/java/org/hibernate/jpa/guide). I could remove the css and the images folder under asciidoc (148) files since we only use the default Asciidoctor theme for now. Otherwise, plain git would probably display all modified files. |
Yes, I think all the "theme" files should have not been moved yet. Just leave them in their original place until (if) we actually need them. No idea about these "tests". The issue is not the ability to "display all modified files" btw. The issue is being able to comment on what needs to be changed. That's what a PR is for, for discussion. If the GitHub UI cannot render all these files then we cannot discuss via line comments in those files obviously. |
From the Help guide:
I'll have to see how I can split that. |
I counted all files under the Userguide and there are 410 and counting. Basically there are two options:
|
The other option is to simply integrate all this work upstream and start from there as a baseline in terms of "review" |
But by and large the "distinction" of all these commits is organic to your workflow, but not so in terms of the overall task. At the end of the day, the user will not care less that this rewrite was done in 5 commits or in 500; it's completely irrelevant. IMO we ought to push this work as of some specific commit you chose, and then begin the review/editing from there. That lets us focus on more atomic edits. |
I have done much progress with the review of the remaining chapters, so I got to Chapter 13. HQL. Although I added more TODO sections, I think it's worth if I review all those to make sure the migration was fine and then we can push them in one big commit and continue the review from there. Afterwards there will be less files to be reviewed anyway. |
In terms of your initial review, sure. But I have already found quite a few edits. Some are pretty large On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:50 AM Vlad Mihalcea notifications@github.com
|
Ok, I'll let you know when the remaining chapters are reviewed and we can push it upstream |
The architecture and the domain model chapters are ready for review. Looking forward to getting your feedback.