Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pmx model scaling #191

Closed
Voileexperiments opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

pmx model scaling #191

Voileexperiments opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@Voileexperiments
Copy link

Voileexperiments commented Aug 17, 2022

MikuMikuMoving has this feature where .pmx models can be scaled freely like .x models. Is it possible to implement it in nanoem?

Without this it is almost impossible to change the scale of model in a satisfactory way:

  • Use .x models: Does not support any of the .pmx model features: bones, morphs, physics, etc.
  • Use scale.fx effect: Incompatible with almost every effect without heavily modifying the effects
  • Edit the model and scale it to desired size: Size cannot be changed dynamically; Moving bones inside MMD becomes unusable for models of very big/small scales.
@hkrn
Copy link
Owner

hkrn commented Aug 22, 2022

The model scaling functionality is implemented in the model editing functionality mentioned in the third item (which is effectively a built-in height measurement plug-in).

However, it is not possible to use scaling as motion in the same way that MikuMikuMoving is implemented. There are no plans to implement it because it is very incompatible with VMD, which have shearing problems and cannot have scale information in VMD specification.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 21, 2022

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Oct 21, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants