Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Global Circular Conv Difference #12

Closed
nviwch opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Global Circular Conv Difference #12

nviwch opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@nviwch
Copy link

nviwch commented Jun 23, 2022

In your code, there is gcc_ca and gcc_dk, I am interesed in the dynamic kernel, how does it perform? Your default config used gcc_ca only.

The original version is constant kernel size and bilinear interpolate to H or W shape.

Dynamic version is dynamic kernel size using taking average of the input in different axis and conv the result as the kernel which is an interesting idea, and it does seem better?

@hkzhang-git
Copy link
Owner

The depth wise dynamic kernel in the submitted code does not achieve better performance. We still working on this part. According to experimental results we have now, using group verision dynamic kernel may achieve competitive performance. I hope this answer is useful for you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants