Use parameter definition order for Python 3.6+ #238
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@philippjfr I think this is ready to merge once the tests pass. |
jbednar
reviewed
Feb 12, 2019
philippjfr
reviewed
Feb 13, 2019
|
Thanks for making the requested changes. |
This was referenced Feb 18, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since Python dictionaries preserve order since 3.6 (and it became part of the CPython spec in 3.7), you no longer have to use parameter precedence to order your widgets as they can appear in definition order. This PR implements this behavior for Python 3.6+.