Second phase completed

[Hombre2014]

All the requirements from the step 2 - interactive list, have been implemented:

• Add a new JavaScript files and import it as a module:
  • it will contain methods related to the status updates (completed: true / false).
• Add event listener to the checkbox (change).
• Update items object's value for completed key upon user actions.
• Store the updated array of items in local storage, so the user gets the correct list values after the page reloads.

[mikenath223]

Hello @Hombre2014

You've done pretty well so far!
But for a few issues, you are almost done with this. Hang in there!

Required Changes ♻️

Please check the comments under the review.

Happy coding, Cheers! 🚀🚀

Do feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, whether it is valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.

---

As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

[mikenath223]

• In src/status.js kindly change all regular functions to es6 arrow function syntax following the JavaScript best practices guide.

[Hombre2014]

I really do not understand your first comment about the README file. I do have

• All the files necessary for deployment are in the /dist folder stated there! Please, clarify!
  For your second comment I would say:
• I used arrow functions where I thought is appropriate and useful. For example in checkButton function. There is no specific requirements to have all my regular functions to be arrow functions! Please, have a look at project requirements from my README.md file (step 2).
• In Java Best practices article from Microverse there is no rule to have all regular functions as arrow functions.
• In code clean article cited above also there is nothing stating that you should use only arrow functions!
• I am repeating the week and this same branch (code) have been approved last week. You can see it here.
  So, I do not really understand your rejection. These might be recommendations and optional changes, but rejection? Please, reply.

[mikethreels]

Hi Yuriy ,

Apologies for the misunderstanding in the previous review, usage of ES6 arrow functions is indeed not a requirement.

Your project is complete! There is nothing else to say other than... it's time to merge it 🚀 :
Congratulations! 🎉

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.

---

As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.