Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

basics, equivalences #49

Closed
RobertHarper opened this issue Mar 29, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

basics, equivalences #49

RobertHarper opened this issue Mar 29, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@RobertHarper
Copy link
Contributor

I'm reviewing, as promised, Chapter 3, but in the process found a typo and a minor unclarity (imho) of the proofs of Lemmas 2.8.11 and 2.8.12, which I have now changed slightly to correct the missing equals sign and make the proof a bit clearer.

The proof of Lemma 3.1.2 seems a little murky to me. I'm going to write out my own version and compare before making any suggestions for any changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant