Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Injectable Application alternative class? #10

Closed
mbits opened this issue Aug 30, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Injectable Application alternative class? #10

mbits opened this issue Aug 30, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@mbits
Copy link

mbits commented Aug 30, 2013

It would be appreciated if the InjectableApplication class code be placed into a separate service class, so that the developer doesn't have to extend InjectableApplication. This is because it is likely that the Application class is already extending a custom Application class.

Cheers,
Matt

@mbits mbits closed this as completed Sep 6, 2013
@paulhoadley
Copy link

Just curious—was this ticket closed because the solution is obvious? I'm just test-driving WOInject, and I've run into the same problem—existing framework-level Application superclass makes it unclear where InjectableApplication should fit into the hierarchy. Is this solvable?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants