Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name it #46

Closed
petdance opened this issue Jul 5, 2012 · 6 comments
Closed

Name it #46

petdance opened this issue Jul 5, 2012 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@petdance
Copy link
Contributor

petdance commented Jul 5, 2012

A new name that is not "tidy" will help differentiate this project from the old HTML4-only tidy.

@geoffmcl
Copy link
Contributor

Now set to tidy5, but when tested and released intend to revert to 'tidy' to overwrite previous... This 'tidy5' is intended to still correctly handle html4 and earlier as well...

@balthisar balthisar modified the milestones: 5.0.0, 0.1 Jan 31, 2015
@balthisar
Copy link
Member

Updated the milestone.

For release I agree that we should still use "tidy" -- it has a heritage to live up to, after all.

I'll leave this issue open for discussion, however.

@ermshiperete
Copy link
Contributor

Is the new tidy backwards-compatible, i.e. do we still use the same command line parameters? Or in other words, will a script that uses the old tidy still work with the new tidy without requiring any modifications? If this is not the case then it might be better to use tidy5 as the name.

@balthisar
Copy link
Member

@ermshiperete, correct. No changes. If you're willing to build it, you can test it now.

@geoffmcl
Copy link
Contributor

geoffmcl commented Apr 2, 2015

@petdance , @balthisar , @ermshiperete as mentioned in issue #190 have pushed a CMakeLists.txt change that uses a macro set(LIB_NAME tidy5), in preparation of making it EASY to change the name back to tidy on release of 5.0.0

@geoffmcl
Copy link
Contributor

The naming strategy has been enumerated, and no further comments for nearly a month, so closing...

Feel free to re-open, or open a new issue... thanks...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants