You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the course of packaging this, I noticed that the built binaries are called client, server, and certificate-gen.
For my Nix derivation, I simply prefix them all with rkvm- but I'm wondering if it would be more appropriate to just fix this in the various binaries' Cargo.toml files so that they're automatically named with a prefix.
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I forgot, the other reason this would be nice, I could add the same GitHub action that I added for another Rust project and you'd get Windows binaries attached to a GHA job for each commit. That way you can get more Windows users without them having to build it.
(versus, a zip of "client.exe, server.exe, certificate-gen.exe" might be a bit weird)
This is also the case for cargo install --path server. It ends up putting a binary called server on your path. So I also think it would be great to rename it. I'm not sure if @htrefil might be more responsive if you just open a PR and maybe they'll just merge it
In the course of packaging this, I noticed that the built binaries are called
client
,server
, andcertificate-gen
.For my Nix derivation, I simply prefix them all with
rkvm-
but I'm wondering if it would be more appropriate to just fix this in the various binaries'Cargo.toml
files so that they're automatically named with a prefix.What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: