Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Firefox ICE resolution to incorrect 0.0.0.0 address #217

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Firefox ICE resolution to incorrect 0.0.0.0 address #217

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

a) Before posting your issue you MUST answer to the questions otherwise it
will be rejected (invalid status) by us
b) Please check the issue tacker to avoid duplication
c) Please provide network capture (Wireshark) or Javascript console log
if you want quick response

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Using ICE 
servers:[{"url":"stun:23.21.150.121:3478"},{"url":"stun:216.93.246.18:3478"},{"u
rl":"stun:66.228.45.110:3478"},{"url":"stun:173.194.78.127:19302"}]"
2. Make outbound call with SIPML5 r222
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

It is expected that the ICE resolution will resolve the public address of the 
machine running SIPML5 (which it does on Chrome). In Firefox it resolves to 
0.0.0.0 . This causes one way audio to result



What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
SIPML5 r222

Please provide any additional information below.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by gbfa...@gmail.com on 17 Mar 2015 at 2:25

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 18 Mar 2015 at 8:46

  • Changed state: Invalid

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hack added in r230: https://code.google.com/p/sipml5/source/detail?r=230

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 18 Mar 2015 at 9:50

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant