Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use magrittr %>% or base R |> pipe? #23

Closed
annakrystalli opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #15
Closed

Use magrittr %>% or base R |> pipe? #23

annakrystalli opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #15

Comments

@annakrystalli
Copy link
Member

Was wondering if you had a preference for importing magrittr pipe or base R |> pipe.

I've been using base R |> pipe so far but that immediately sets R 4.1.0 or greater as a dependency so on second thought, asking folks to upgrade R to use the package might be a big ask.
@annakrystalli annakrystalli mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2022
Merged
@elray1
Copy link
Contributor

elray1 commented Oct 19, 2022

I support using to %>% (as we discussed an you have already done; just commenting to have written record of this discussion :) )

Bisaloo added a commit to Bisaloo/hubEnsembles that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2024
@Bisaloo
Use magrittr pipe consistently
1d3c2ad 
To avoid a dependency on R 4.1

As discussed in hubverse-org/hubUtils#23
@Bisaloo Bisaloo mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
hubverse Development overview
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[WIP] Add Hub Connection Functionality hubverse-org/hubUtils
2 participants
@elray1 @annakrystalli