Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unsure about the mantel test result #17

Closed
B-1991-ing opened this issue Apr 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Unsure about the mantel test result #17

B-1991-ing opened this issue Apr 28, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@B-1991-ing
Copy link

B-1991-ing commented Apr 28, 2023

Hi Houyun,

I carefully looked into the changing trend of my two matrixes, and not sure my command lines were right. So, could you please help me have a check? I attached my data and code.

data_and_code.zip

Thank you very much.

Best,

Bing

@Hy4m
Copy link
Owner

Hy4m commented May 2, 2023

I had no problems after the test, and can you tell me what your problem is?

image

library(linkET)
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
data_o <- read.table(file.choose(), sep="\t", row.names = 1, header = TRUE)

O_e <- read.table(file.choose(), sep="\t", row.names = 1, header = TRUE)


###mantel test
mantel_oms <- mantel_test(data_o, O_e,  
                          spec_select = list(m1 = 1:1, 
                                             m2 = 2:2, 
                                             m3 = 3:3, 
                                             m4 = 4:4,
                                             m5 = 5:5,
                                             m6 = 6:6,
                                             m7 = 7:7,
                                             m8 = 8:8),
                          spec_dist = dist_func(.FUN = "vegdist",
                                                method = "euclidean")) %>% 
  mutate(rd = cut(r, breaks = c(-Inf, 0.2, 0.4, Inf),
                  labels = c("< 0.2", "0.2 - 0.4", ">= 0.4")),
         pd = cut(p, breaks = c(-Inf, 0.01, 0.05, Inf),
                  labels = c("< 0.01", "0.01 - 0.05", ">= 0.05")))

o_plot <- correlate(O_e, engine = "correlation") %>% 
  as_md_tbl(type = "lower", diag = FALSE) %>%
  qcorrplot() +
  geom_square() +
  geom_mark(
    sep = '\n', 
    size = 3,
    sig_level = c(0.05, 0.01, 0.001),
    mark = c("*", "**", "***"),
    colour = "#000000", only_mark = FALSE) +
  
  scale_fill_gradientn(
    colours = colorRampPalette(colors =c("#A6CEE3","white","#ED665D"),space="Lab")(10),
    limits = c(-1, 1),
    breaks = seq(-1,1,0.5))+ 
  
  geom_couple(aes(x = .x - 0.2, colour = pd, size = rd, linetype = r > 0),
              
              data = mantel_oms, 
              curvature = nice_curvature(0.1), label.size =4, nudge_x= 0.2) + 
  
  scale_size_manual(values = c(0.5, 1, 2)) +
  
  scale_color_manual(values = c("#d00000", "#fcbf49","#d9d9d9")) +  
  #scale_color_manual(values = c("#d9d9d9")) +  
  scale_linetype_manual(values = c("TRUE" = "solid", "FALSE" = "dashed"),
                        labels = c("Positive", "Negative")) +
  theme(axis.text.x.bottom = element_text(angle = 45, hjust = 1, vjust = 1)) +
  
  guides(size = guide_legend(title = "Mantel's r",
                             override.aes = list(colour = "grey35"), 
                             order = 2),
         colour = guide_legend(title = "Mantel's p", 
                               override.aes = list(size = 3), 
                               order = 1),
         fill = guide_colorbar(title = "Pearson's r", order = 4),
         linetype = guide_legend(title = "Mantel's r > 0", 
                                 override.aes = list(size = 0.5, colour = "darkblue"), 
                                 order = 3))
o_plot

@B-1991-ing
Copy link
Author

Thank you Houyun.

My problem is that all significant relationships are denoted as positive relationship instead of some significant positive relationship and some significant negative relationship. I know I asked once. Sorry for the double asking. Maybe you can close the question.

Best,

Bing

@Hy4m
Copy link
Owner

Hy4m commented May 2, 2023

I think it's OK.

Finally, it's better to email me for similar questions rather than an issue, since it's not a question about linkET package.

@Hy4m Hy4m closed this as completed May 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants