Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmarking Parameter Estimation Methods on biopredynbench Advice #1043

Closed
Mjvolk3 opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Benchmarking Parameter Estimation Methods on biopredynbench Advice #1043

Mjvolk3 opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@Mjvolk3
Copy link

Mjvolk3 commented Apr 3, 2023

I would like to be able to benchmark some parameter estimation methods we have developed against biopredynbench. I have been using PEtab, pyPESTO, and AMICI for all my development. The models from biopredynbench have AMIGO, C, COPASI, Matlab, and SBML directories. I've been considering converting the COPASI files to PEtab filers to build the pyPESTO problem. Are you aware of a simpler way? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!

@yannikschaelte
Copy link
Member

Given that you are already using AMICI, PEtab and pyPESTO, I agree that encoding the benchmark problems via PEtab is the way to go. Unfortunately it seems that in the repository you linked, not all formats provide the entire information, in particular the COPASI format provides the dynamics, but not the parameter estimation problem, which needs to be defined manually on the GUI. However e.g. the AMIGO one seems to do so. It should yet be straightforward to take e.g. the SBML model definition, and the parameter bounds from COPASI, and the objective function definition from wherever that is defined, and combine it to a PEtab problem.

BTW: If you are looking for benchmark problems, these here may be of interest to you -- a larger set of models already in PEtab format. https://github.com/Benchmarking-Initiative

@yannikschaelte yannikschaelte self-assigned this Apr 5, 2023
@PaulJonasJost PaulJonasJost added the question Further information is requested label Apr 30, 2023
@dweindl dweindl closed this as completed Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants