Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for multiple servers and use without project #29

Closed
johanrosenson opened this issue Jan 30, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for multiple servers and use without project #29

johanrosenson opened this issue Jan 30, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@johanrosenson
Copy link

I only work against FTP-servers and thats why i have this question, would it be possible to add support for multiple servers?

Also is it possible to show the pane for remote-ftp but hide the atom file tree? That file tree is of no use to me when i use remote-ftp.

Third small question, is it possible to add an option to move the remote-ftp pane to the right side instead?

@grenierdev
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Use without project
    For failsafe reason and to hook up in the save mechanism, I need to put downloaded files somewhere on the hard drive. I rather let the user choose where than use system temp folder. Atom's project folder is a perfect fit for this requirement.

  2. Multiple servers
    I do not plan to add multiple server configuration before Atom state what their decision will be on multiple project (Atom 1.0 roadmap). Likely this will mean we'll be able to create per project configuration, thus enabling multiple server configuration!

  3. Hide local tree view
    In the Remote-FTP package configuration (File -> Settings -> Packages -> Remote-FTP). Check Hide Local When Displayed.

  4. Pane to the right side
    Head to the tree-view package configuration (File -> Settings -> Packages -> tree-view). Check Show On Right Side.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 7, 2015

I'm new to Atom but saddened that I can't find a package like yours but for multiple servers...

@Subfader
Copy link

I agree with verya. 2016 now and it's still not possible. Not a full replacement for UltraEdit yet :/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants