New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mechanical contact algorithms #10950
Comments
I'm going to reopen this issue and make it a catch-all for mechanical contact algorithm development |
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
Copying over from #14546 (comment)
|
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This batch of tests illustrates the susceptiblity of pure node-face mechanical contact algorithms to ping-ponging. In this case the ping-ponging comes from oscillation of a slave node between two different master faces. A hybrid scheme in which LM residuals are computed at slave nodes while primal residuals are computed on mortar integrals does not display oscillations. This does not necessarily mean that the hybrid scheme is immune to oscillations, but it at least performs better on this test case. Refs idaholab#10950
This prevents us from having singular Jacobians Refs idaholab#10950
This prevents us from having singular Jacobians Refs idaholab#10950
Can use this option to ensure slave node projection onto master surfaces. Refs idaholab#10950
This prevents us from having singular Jacobians Refs idaholab#10950
This is now covered by more specific issues for remaining work, and we have made great progress with mortar |
Rationale
Mechanical contact often displays difficult convergence.
Description
Contact introduces non-smooth character into the residual function which poses a challenge to Newton's method. A smart line search may reduce some of the deleterious effects.
Impact
Improve solve behavior for problems involving contact.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: