New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Block weighted partitioner #13675
Labels
C: Framework
P: normal
A defect affecting operation with a low possibility of significantly affects.
T: task
An enhancement to the software.
Comments
fdkong
added
T: task
An enhancement to the software.
P: normal
A defect affecting operation with a low possibility of significantly affects.
labels
Jul 1, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2019
fdkong
added a commit
to fdkong/moose
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C: Framework
P: normal
A defect affecting operation with a low possibility of significantly affects.
T: task
An enhancement to the software.
Reason
Different blocks may have different physics. The work load per element is different
block-by-block. Regular partitioner will give us an imbalance calculation.
Design
Allow users to assign high weights for heavy blocks and low weights for other light blocks.
Impact
Users who care about this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: