-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an electromagnetics module #17641
Conversation
Tagging @skatersaurus |
8b8a507
to
549b66f
Compare
809b413
to
c04baf4
Compare
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Begone stalebot |
799f0d5
to
7b8fac9
Compare
fbb0202
to
5881c85
Compare
Very excited for this.... we have been waiting some time :) |
b5308b1
to
ebfeaba
Compare
Job Documentation on 5a676ee wanted to post the following: View the site here This comment will be updated on new commits. |
@cticenhour any plans on moving the bulk of this content over to large_media? |
Yes - leaving it in the branch was a convenience until I deemed this "ready for review". If this passes, one more commit to add a proper module landing page, and I'll be moving the media assets over. |
55e8483
to
5eb84cd
Compare
b11740f
to
2939a9e
Compare
Rebased on devel to test the new build env on request from @loganharbour. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mostly cosmetics
I'll re-iterate that the module is exceptionally well documented, well tested, intelligently and intelligibly built.
modules/electromagnetics/test/tests/auxkernels/current_density/tests
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/electromagnetics/test/tests/postprocessors/reflection_coefficient/tests
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Giudicelli <guillaume.giudicelli@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Giudicelli <guillaume.giudicelli@gmail.com>
837cb12
to
879ae5a
Compare
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Giudicelli <guillaume.giudicelli@gmail.com>
879ae5a
to
0a336be
Compare
…xpand FunctionDiffusion in framework to satisfy capability (idaholab#13744)
modules/electromagnetics/doc/content/source/auxkernels/CurrentDensity.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/electromagnetics/doc/content/source/auxkernels/CurrentDensity.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/electromagnetics/doc/content/source/auxkernels/PotentialToFieldAux.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/electromagnetics/doc/content/source/auxkernels/PotentialToFieldAux.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/electromagnetics/doc/content/source/bcs/VectorEMRobinBC.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thanks for the comments @loganharbour. Will make a small follow up with these changes so as not to go through testing and approvals again. |
WOot!
…On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:44 PM Casey Icenhour ***@***.***> wrote:
Merged #17641 <#17641> into next.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#17641 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXFOIAWI2EODTSU5EZKLBTVRSKQLANCNFSM43F5YWYA>
.
You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Closes #13744
Still a few verification cases to move over and some doco to write, so marking as WIP for now.Still to do (that I know of, as a result of testing):
std::complex
related failure (GCC?)EDIT 5-23-2022
Relevant ELK issues in this commit history were converted to MOOSE issues. They are listed below:
#21074, #21075, #21076, #21077, #21078, #21079, #21080, #21081, #21082, #21083, #21084, #21085, #21086, #21087, #21088, #21089, #21090, #21091, #21092, #21093, #21094, #21095, #21096, #21097, #21098, #21099, #21100
EDIT 6-1-2022
Closes #21202